The potential production of stigma through health promotion campaigns is a problem that has not received attention in the current literature on the sociology of health promotion. Cultural production studies can shed light onto the ways in which injury prevention campaigns, and public health campaigns more generally, may call for life-saving interventions at the social expense of people with disabilities or other stigmatized conditions. Questioned here are not only the presumed benefits of health promotion campaigns, but also our conventional understandings of 'health' and 'disability'. This paper examines the way in which cultural production studies can contribute to a theory of the production of stigma by public health professionals. One view of cultural production views culture as a reflection of economic relationships between the dominant and the dominated. A second approach emphasizes the 'reception' of cultural works, or how audiences experience culture. Third, cultural production is sometimes analyzed in terms of texts, or the content of cultural artifacts. Insight into the dilemmas of health promotion can be provided by analyzing health promotion strategies in terms of their production, reception, and content as cultural works. Focusing on the case study of injury control and disability rights, health promotion campaigns are seen as potentially contributing to the production of stigma for people who already possess the attributes targeted for prevention. This analysis moves toward a broader theoretical foundation with which to grasp the unintended, even harmful consequences of prevention strategies, and the shared and oppositional interests of people with stigmatized conditions, targeted audiences of prevention, and public health advocates.