The reinforcing and discriminative stimulus properties of para-ethoxy- and para-methoxyamphetamine

Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1992 Jan;41(1):165-9. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(92)90077-s.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was two-fold: 1) to assess the degree to which para-methoxyamphetamine and para-ethoxyamphetamine maintain self-administration behavior, and 2) to determine the similarity or difference between these drugs and amphetamine in drug discrimination tests. Animals were trained to self-administer 0.3 mg/kg/infusion cocaine on a fixed-ratio 5 (FR5) schedule of reinforcement. Substitution of para-ethoxyamphetamine (PEA), para-methoxyamphetamine (PMA), or saline produced similar results; in all cases responding decreased substantially. A separate group of animals was trained to discriminate amphetamine (1 mg/kg) from saline in a fixed-ratio (FR10), food-reinforced paradigm. PEA and PMA produced only limited responding on the amphetamine-appropriate lever (maximum of approximately 30%). Both PMA and PEA had effects on response rate which were similar to those of amphetamine, although PMA had slightly greater rate-decreasing effects than the other two compounds. These data suggest that neither PMA nor PEA are reinforcing in rats, and do not possess amphetamine-like discriminative properties.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Amphetamines / pharmacology*
  • Animals
  • Cocaine / pharmacology
  • Conditioning, Operant / drug effects*
  • Dextroamphetamine / pharmacology
  • Discrimination, Psychological / drug effects*
  • Hallucinogens / pharmacology*
  • Male
  • Rats
  • Reinforcement Schedule
  • Self Administration

Substances

  • Amphetamines
  • Hallucinogens
  • 4-ethoxyamphetamine
  • Cocaine
  • 4-methoxyamphetamine
  • Dextroamphetamine