Outcomes in localized prostate cancer: National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden follow-up study

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Jul 7;102(13):950-8. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq154. Epub 2010 Jun 18.

Abstract

Background: Treatment for localized prostate cancer remains controversial. To our knowledge, there are no outcome studies from contemporary population-based cohorts that include data on stage, Gleason score, and serum levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA).

Methods: In the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden Follow-up Study, a nationwide cohort, we identified 6849 patients aged 70 years or younger. Inclusion criteria were diagnosis with local clinical stage T1-2 prostate cancer from January 1, 1997, through December 31, 2002, a Gleason score of 7 or less, a serum PSA level of less than 20 ng/mL, and treatment with surveillance (including active surveillance and watchful waiting, n = 2021) or curative intent (including radical prostatectomy, n = 3399, and radiation therapy, n = 1429). Among the 6849 patients, 2686 had low-risk prostate cancer (ie, clinical stage T1, Gleason score 2-6, and serum PSA level of <10 ng/mL). The study cohort was linked to the Cause of Death Register, and cumulative incidence of death from prostate cancer and competing causes was calculated.

Results: For the combination of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancers, calculated cumulative 10-year prostate cancer-specific mortality was 3.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.7% to 4.8%) in the surveillance group and 2.7% (95% CI = 2.1% to 3.45) in the curative intent group. For those with low-risk disease, the corresponding values were 2.4% (95% CI = 1.2% to 4.1%) among the 1085 patients in the surveillance group and 0.7% (95% CI = 0.3% to 1.4%) among the 1601 patients in the curative intent group. The 10-year risk of dying from competing causes was 19.2% (95% CI = 17.2% to 21.3%) in the surveillance group and 10.2% (95% CI = 9.0% to 11.4%) in the curative intent group.

Conclusion: A 10-year prostate cancer-specific mortality of 2.4% among patients with low-risk prostate cancer in the surveillance group indicates that surveillance may be a suitable treatment option for many patients with low-risk disease.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Androgen Antagonists / administration & dosage
  • Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal / administration & dosage
  • Biomarkers, Tumor / blood
  • Comorbidity
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Population Surveillance
  • Prostate-Specific Antigen / blood
  • Prostatectomy
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / epidemiology
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / immunology
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / mortality*
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / pathology*
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / therapy
  • Radiotherapy, Adjuvant
  • Registries
  • Research Design
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Selection Bias
  • Socioeconomic Factors
  • Sweden / epidemiology
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Androgen Antagonists
  • Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal
  • Biomarkers, Tumor
  • Prostate-Specific Antigen