Outcomes associated with introduction of a shoulder dystocia protocol

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Dec;205(6):513-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.05.002. Epub 2011 May 7.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess outcomes that are associated with the implementation of a shoulder dystocia protocol that is focused on team response. We identified women who had a shoulder dystocia during 3 time periods: 6 months before (period A), 6 months during (period B), and 6 months after (period C) the institution of a shoulder dystocia protocol. Documentation and health outcomes were compared among the time periods. During the study period, 254 women (77, 100, and 77 in periods A, B, and C, respectively) had a shoulder dystocia. There were no differences among study periods in patient characteristics. However, complete and consistent documentation increased (14% to 50% to 92%; P < .001), and brachial plexus palsy that was diagnosed at delivery (10.1% to 4.0% to 2.6%; P = .03) and at neonatal discharge (7.6% to 3.0% to 1.3%; P = .04) declined.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Birth Injuries / prevention & control
  • Dystocia / diagnosis*
  • Dystocia / prevention & control*
  • Dystocia / therapy
  • Extraction, Obstetrical / methods*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Paralysis, Obstetric / diagnosis
  • Paralysis, Obstetric / prevention & control
  • Paralysis, Obstetric / therapy
  • Pregnancy
  • Pregnancy Outcome*
  • Shoulder*