Outcomes of concomitant aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting at teaching hospitals versus nonteaching hospitals

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Mar;143(3):648-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.04.041. Epub 2011 Jun 30.

Abstract

Objective: Hospitals with a high volume and academic status produce better patient outcomes than other hospitals after complex surgical procedures. Risk models show that concomitant aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting pose a greater risk than isolated coronary artery bypass grafting or aortic valve replacement. We examined the relationship of hospital teaching status and the presence of a thoracic surgery residency program with aortic valve replacement/coronary artery bypass grafting outcomes.

Methods: By using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database, we identified patients who underwent concomitant aortic valve replacement/coronary artery bypass grafting from 1998 to 2007 at nonteaching hospitals, teaching hospitals without a thoracic surgery residency program, and teaching hospitals with a thoracic surgery residency program. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify intergroup differences. Risk-adjusted multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess independent predictors of in-hospital mortality and complication rates.

Results: The 3 groups of patients did not differ significantly in their baseline characteristics. Patients who underwent aortic valve replacement/coronary artery bypass grafting had higher overall risk-adjusted complication rates in nonteaching hospitals (odds ratio 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.39-1.80; P < .0001) and teaching hospitals without a thoracic surgery residency program (odds ratio 1.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-1.60; P < .0001) than in thoracic surgery residency program hospitals. However, no difference was observed in the adjusted mortality rate for nonteaching hospitals (odds ratio 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-1.04; P = .25) or teaching hospitals without a thoracic surgery residency program (odds ratio 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.08; P = .98) when compared with thoracic surgery residency program hospitals. Robust statistical models were used for analysis, with c-statistics of 0.98 (complications) and 0.82 (mortality).

Conclusion: Patients who require complex cardiac operations may have better outcomes when treated at teaching hospitals with a thoracic surgery residency program.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Aortic Valve / surgery*
  • Coronary Artery Bypass / adverse effects
  • Coronary Artery Bypass / education*
  • Coronary Artery Bypass / mortality
  • Education, Medical, Graduate* / statistics & numerical data
  • Female
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation / adverse effects
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation / education*
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation / mortality
  • Hospital Mortality
  • Hospitals, Teaching* / statistics & numerical data
  • Humans
  • Internship and Residency* / statistics & numerical data
  • Logistic Models
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Odds Ratio
  • Postoperative Complications / etiology
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Assessment
  • Risk Factors
  • Thoracic Surgery / education*
  • Thoracic Surgery / statistics & numerical data
  • Treatment Outcome
  • United States / epidemiology