Interviewer BMI effects on under- and over-reporting of restrained eating: evidence from a national Dutch face-to-face survey and a postal follow-up

Int J Public Health. 2012 Jun;57(3):643-7. doi: 10.1007/s00038-011-0323-z. Epub 2011 Nov 25.

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the effect of interviewer BMI on self-reported restrained eating in a face-to-face survey and to examine under- and over-reporting using the face-to face study and a postal follow-up.

Methods: A sample of 1,212 Dutch adults was assigned to 98 interviewers with different BMI who administered an eating questionnaire. To further evaluate misreporting a mail follow-up was conducted among 504 participants. Data were analyzed using two-level hierarchical models.

Results: Interviewer BMI had a positive effect on restrained eating. Normal weight and pre-obese interviewers obtained valid responses, underweight interviewers stimulated under-reporting whereas obese interviewers triggered over-reporting.

Conclusion: In face-to-face interviews self-reported dietary restraint is distorted by interviewer BMI. This result has implications for public health surveys, the more so given the expanding obesity epidemic.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Body Mass Index*
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Feeding Behavior*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Interviews as Topic
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Netherlands
  • Public Health
  • Self Report*
  • Young Adult