Comparative Assessment of Guidewire and Microcatheter vs a Crossing Device-Based Strategy to Traverse Infrainguinal Peripheral Artery Chronic Total Occlusions

J Endovasc Ther. 2015 Aug;22(4):525-34. doi: 10.1177/1526602815587707. Epub 2015 May 18.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare success rates of a guidewire and microcatheter strategy vs the use of specialized crossing devices to traverse infrainguinal peripheral artery chronic total occlusions (CTOs).

Methods: For this analysis, data on 438 consecutive infrainguinal CTO interventions in 438 patients (mean age 63.2 years; 402 men) performed between August 2006 and May 2014 were extracted from the multicenter Excellence in Peripheral Artery Disease (XLPAD) database (ClinicalTrials.gov; identifier NCT01904851). Primary technical success constituted placement of a guidewire in the true lumen, past the distal CTO cap, with the initial crossing strategy.

Results: A wire-catheter strategy was used in 295 (67.4%) and a specialized CTO crossing device in 143 (32.6%) patients (p<0.001). Primary crossing technical success was higher with CTO devices (72.1% vs 51.9%, p<0.001). The primary wire-catheter arm used significantly more secondary CTO devices (28.1% vs 17.5%) and/or provisional re-entry devices (26.7% vs 4.9%) compared with the primary CTO device arm (both p<0.001). Secondary crossing technical success (defined as crossing with an alternate strategy: 67.5% vs 71.4%, p=1.000), provisional crossing technical success (defined as use of a re-entry device: 84.2% vs 87.5%, p=0.768), and procedure success (93.6% vs 90.9%, p=0.332) were similar between the wire-catheter and CTO device strategies, respectively. No differences were observed in periprocedural complications or 30-day adverse events; however, at 12 months, there was a significantly higher surgical revascularization rate in the primary wire-catheter arm (8.8% vs 2.8%, p=0.025).

Conclusion: Infrainguinal peripheral artery CTO crossing is frequently attempted with a wire-catheter technique; however, an initial CTO crossing device approach is associated with higher primary technical success. Overall procedure success is similar with both strategies.

Keywords: anterior tibial artery; chronic total occlusion; crossing device; endovascular procedures; guidewire; microcatheter; occlusion; peripheral artery disease; peroneal artery; popliteal artery; posterior tibial artery; stenosis; superficial femoral artery.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Multicenter Study

MeSH terms

  • Angiography
  • Anticoagulants / administration & dosage
  • Arterial Occlusive Diseases / surgery*
  • Catheterization
  • Comorbidity
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Leg / blood supply*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Peripheral Vascular Diseases / surgery*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Registries
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Factors
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Vascular Access Devices*

Substances

  • Anticoagulants

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT01904851