Selection for Mitochondrial Quality Drives Evolution of the Germline

PLoS Biol. 2016 Dec 20;14(12):e2000410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2000410. eCollection 2016 Dec.

Abstract

The origin of the germline-soma distinction is a fundamental unsolved question. Plants and basal metazoans do not have a germline but generate gametes from pluripotent stem cells in somatic tissues (somatic gametogenesis). In contrast, most bilaterians sequester a dedicated germline early in development. We develop an evolutionary model which shows that selection for mitochondrial quality drives germline evolution. In organisms with low mitochondrial replication error rates, segregation of mutations over multiple cell divisions generates variation, allowing selection to optimize gamete quality through somatic gametogenesis. Higher mutation rates promote early germline sequestration. We also consider how oogamy (a large female gamete packed with mitochondria) alters selection on the germline. Oogamy is beneficial as it reduces mitochondrial segregation in early development, improving adult fitness by restricting variation between tissues. But it also limits variation between early-sequestered oocytes, undermining gamete quality. Oocyte variation is restored through proliferation of germline cells, producing more germ cells than strictly needed, explaining the random culling (atresia) of precursor cells in bilaterians. Unlike other models of germline evolution, selection for mitochondrial quality can explain the stability of somatic gametogenesis in plants and basal metazoans, the evolution of oogamy in all plants and animals with tissue differentiation, and the mutational forces driving early germline sequestration in active bilaterians. The origins of predation in motile bilaterians in the Cambrian explosion is likely to have increased rates of tissue turnover and mitochondrial replication errors, in turn driving germline evolution and the emergence of complex developmental processes.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Biological Evolution*
  • Female
  • Germ Cells*
  • Mitochondria / genetics*
  • Oocytes
  • Selection, Genetic*

Grants and funding

EPSRC https://www.epsrc.ac.uk/ (grant number EP/L504889/1). Received by ZH. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. NERC http://www.nerc.ac.uk/ (grant number NE/G00563X/1). Received by AP. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. EPSRC https://www.epsrc.ac.uk/ (grant number EP/F500351/1, EP/I017909/1, EP/K038656/1). Received by AP. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Leverhulme Turst https://www.leverhulme.ac.uk/ (grant number RPG-425). Received by NL. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. EPSRC https://www.epsrc.ac.uk/ (EP/F500351/1). Received by AR. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.