From Healthcare to Warfare and Reverse: How Should We Regulate Dual-Use Neurotechnology?

Neuron. 2018 Jan 17;97(2):269-274. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.12.017.

Abstract

Recent advances in military-funded neurotechnology and novel opportunities for misusing neurodevices show that the problem of dual use is inherent to neuroscience. This paper discusses how the neuroscience community should respond to these dilemmas and delineates a neuroscience-specific biosecurity framework. This neurosecurity framework involves calibrated regulation, (neuro)ethical guidelines, and awareness-raising activities within the scientific community.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Armed Conflicts
  • Biomedical Technology / ethics*
  • Biomedical Technology / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Computer Security
  • Diagnostic Techniques, Neurological / adverse effects
  • Diagnostic Techniques, Neurological / ethics*
  • Dual Use Research / ethics*
  • Dual Use Research / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Humans
  • Inventions / ethics*
  • Inventions / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Lie Detection
  • Military Medicine / ethics*
  • Military Medicine / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Nervous System Diseases / rehabilitation
  • Nervous System Diseases / therapy
  • Neurosciences / ethics*
  • Neurosciences / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Self-Help Devices / adverse effects
  • Self-Help Devices / ethics
  • Terrorism
  • Torture