Efficacy of Secretagogues in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

Gastroenterology. 2018 Dec;155(6):1753-1763. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.08.021. Epub 2018 Aug 23.

Abstract

Background & aims: Several secretagogues have been approved for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C). However, their relative efficacy is unclear because there have been no head-to-head randomized controlled trials. We conducted a network meta-analysis to compare their efficacies in patients with IBS-C.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, EMBASE Classic, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials through June 2018 to identify randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of secretagogues in adults with IBS-C. Trials included in the analysis reported a dichotomous assessment of overall response to therapy, and data were pooled using a random-effects model. Efficacy and safety of secretagogues were reported as a pooled relative risk with 95% confidence interval to summarize the effect of each comparison tested, and treatments were ranked according to their P score.

Results: We identified 15 eligible randomized controlled trials of secretagogues that included 8462 patients. Linaclotide, lubiprostone, plecanatide, and tenapanor were superior to placebo for the treatment of IBS-C. Linaclotide (290 μg once daily) was ranked first in efficacy based on the end point recommended by the Food and Drug Administration for trials in IBS-C, the primary end point used in each trial, abdominal pain, and complete spontaneous bowel movements. Tenapanor (50 mg twice daily) was ranked first for decreasing bloating. Total numbers of adverse events were significantly larger with linaclotide (290 and 500 μg once daily) and plecanatide (3 mg once daily) compared with placebo. However, plecanatide 6 mg once daily ranked first for safety. Diarrhea was significantly more common with all drugs, except lubiprostone (8 μg twice daily). Nausea was significantly more common in patients who received lubiprostone.

Conclusions: In a network analysis of randomized controlled trials of secretagogues for IBS-C, we found all drugs to be superior to placebo. Efficacy was similar among individual drugs and dosages for most end points. However, data were extracted at the 12-week time point, so the long-term relative efficacy of these drugs is unknown.

Keywords: Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement; Effectiveness; Randomized Controlled Trial Comparison; Treatment Response.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Constipation / drug therapy*
  • Constipation / etiology
  • Female
  • Gastrointestinal Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Humans
  • Irritable Bowel Syndrome / complications
  • Irritable Bowel Syndrome / drug therapy*
  • Isoquinolines / therapeutic use
  • Lubiprostone / therapeutic use
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Natriuretic Peptides / therapeutic use
  • Network Meta-Analysis
  • Peptides / therapeutic use
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Secretagogues / therapeutic use*
  • Sulfonamides / therapeutic use
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Gastrointestinal Agents
  • Isoquinolines
  • Natriuretic Peptides
  • Peptides
  • Secretagogues
  • Sulfonamides
  • Lubiprostone
  • plecanatide
  • linaclotide
  • tenapanor