Objective: To analyze the relevant literature on China's occupational health standard from 2001 to 2016, and to provide a basis for further improving China's occupational health standard system. Methods: Wanfang Data, CNKI, VIP, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Knowledge were used to retrieve relevant literature on China's occupational health standard from 2001 to 2016. Information of the literature was collected, and type of literature, time and region, first author's affiliation, and research funding were analyzed by bibliometrics. Results: The relevant literature on China's occupational health standard was concentrated domestically and in the health system, and the number of documents was highly correlated with socio-economic conditions. The literature was dominated by the research on onsite application of occupational health (53.08%) , while there was less research on occupational health standard (11.78%) . The number of published articles and funding intensity were significantly different between centers for disease control and prevention at different levels. Conclusion: It is suggested to accelerate the application of evidence-based medicine and systematic review in the development of occupational health standard, enhance the research ability of county/district-level disease control officers, assist them in summarizing and publishing their daily work experience, and give them appropriate funding, so as to promote the accumulation of knowledge in the field of occupational health.
目的： 通过对2001~2016年我国职业卫生标准相关文献进行分析，为进一步完善我国职业卫生标准体系提供依据。 方法： 采用文献计量学法，分别使用万方、中国知网（CNKI）、维普、Pubmed、Embase、Web of Knowledge等数据库,检索2001~2016年我国职业卫生标准相关文献，提取其信息并运用文献计量学方法对文献类型、时间地域、第一作者单位和科研基金资助情况进行分析。 结果： 职业卫生标准相关文献集中于国内和卫生系统内、文献数量与社会经济条件高度相关，职业卫生现场应用文献为主（53.08%），职业卫生标准研究方面研究较少（11.78%），不同级别的疾控中心发表文献的数量和基金资助力度差别较大。 结论： 建议加快循证医学和系统性综述在职业卫生标准研制过程中的应用，并提高区县疾控人员的科研能力，帮助其将日常的工作经验总结发表成科研文献并给予适当的资助，以促进职业卫生领域知识的积累。.
Keywords: Bibliometric; Occupational health standard; Research literature.