A bibliometric analysis of the spine journals

Mantu Jain; Chitta Ranjan Mohnaty; Jagannatha Sahoo; Rakesh Vadakkethil Radhakrishnan; Mridul Biswas

doi:10.1016/j.jcot.2021.02.005

A bibliometric analysis of the spine journals

J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021 Feb 17:16:219-225. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.02.005. eCollection 2021 May.

Authors

Mantu Jain¹, Chitta Ranjan Mohnaty², Jagannatha Sahoo³, Rakesh Vadakkethil Radhakrishnan⁴, Mridul Biswas¹

Affiliations

¹ Department of Orthopedics, AIIMS, Bhubaneswar, 751019, India.
² Department of Trauma and Emergency, AIIMS, Bhubaneswar, 751019, India.
³ Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, AIIMS, Bhubaneswar, 751019, India.
⁴ College of Nursing, AIIMS, Bhubaneswar, 751019, India.

Abstract

Background: Spine is a rapidly growing branch with fully-dedicated peer-reviewed journals. Journal impact factor (JIF), speed of publication, and readership are some critical factors affecting the author's choice for submission. This study aimed to find the bibliometric data of spine journals.

Method: Fourteen Spine journals in NCBI (National centre for Biotechnology information, USA) database, meeting the inclusion criterion were analyzed for original articles, collected via stratified sampling from each issue of the journal. The dates to submission (DS), acceptance (DA), and publication (DP), study design, corresponding author's details like-subject specialization and country of affiliation were recorded for each original article. Data on JIF, number of issues/years, open access availability (OA), article processing charges (APC) were also retrieved. Correlation and geographic plot were used to display the findings.

Results: The median (interquartile range) time for submission to publication/total time (TT) in spine journals was 175 (120-313) days with a submission to acceptance time of 107 (66-168) days and acceptance to publication time of 54 (20-170). Fifty-seven percent of the journals had APC, and all had options for OA. A significant correlation was noted between all determinants of publication speed and the Scimago Journal rankings (SJR) (AT: r = 0.238, PT: r = 0.074, TT: r = 0.288, p < 0.001). Amongst the author affiliations, the USA (37.5%) and Japan (18.6%) had the maximum contributions. Furthermore, 57.4% of authors were orthopaedicians, and 14.4% were neurosurgeons. Retrospective and prospective cohort studies were the standard study designs (48% vs. 20.9%), while clinical trials accounted for 5.8%.

Conclusion: Spine journals had comparable publication speed with other biomedical journals; all spine journals had OA options. Observational study dominates the pattern in spine research. The contribution is mainly from orthopaedician, but the trend is changing towards collaborative research with neurosurgeons.

Keywords: Bibliometric; Contribution; Impact factor; Speed of publication; Spine journals.