How to bring peer review ghostwriters out of the dark

Mol Biol Cell. 2021 Mar 15;32(6):461-466. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E20-10-0642.

Abstract

Early career researchers are frequent and valuable contributors to peer review. Systemic changes that acknowledge this fact would result in ethical co-reviewing, peer reviews of greater quality, and a reduction in peer reviewer burden.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Authorship*
  • Humans
  • Peer Review, Research / standards
  • Peer Review, Research / trends*
  • Research Personnel / psychology
  • Scientific Misconduct / ethics*
  • Scientific Misconduct / trends