Gender disparity between authors in leading medical journals during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional review

BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 14;11(7):e051224. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051224.

Abstract

Objectives: Evaluate gender differences in authorship of COVID-19 articles in high-impact medical journals compared with other topics.

Design: Cross-sectional review.

Data sources: Medline database.

Eligibility criteria: Articles published from 1 January to 31 December 2020 in the seven leading general medical journals by impact factor. Article types included primary research, reviews, editorials and commentaries.

Data extraction: Key data elements were whether the study topic was related to COVID-19 and names of the principal and the senior authors. A hierarchical approach was used to determine the likely gender of authors. Logistic regression assessed the association of study characteristics, including COVID-19 status, with authors' likely gender; this was quantified using adjusted ORs (aORs).

Results: We included 2252 articles, of which 748 (33.2%) were COVID-19-related and 1504 (66.8%) covered other topics. A likely gender was determined for 2138 (94.9%) principal authors and 1890 (83.9%) senior authors. Men were significantly more likely to be both principal (1364 men; 63.8%) and senior (1332 men; 70.5%) authors. COVID-19-related articles were not associated with the odds of men being principal (aOR 0.99; 95% CI 0.81 to 1.21; p=0.89) or senior authors (aOR 0.96; 95% CI 0.78 to 1.19; p=0.71) relative to other topics. Articles with men as senior authors were more likely to have men as principal authors (aOR 1.49; 95% CI 1.21 to 1.83; p<0.001). Men were more likely to author articles reporting original research and those with corresponding authors based outside the USA and Europe.

Conclusions: Women were substantially under-represented as authors among articles in leading medical journals; this was not significantly different for COVID-19-related articles. Study limitations include potential for misclassification bias due to the name-based analysis. Results suggest that barriers to women's authorship in high-impact journals during COVID-19 are not significantly larger than barriers that preceded the pandemic and that are likely to continue beyond it.

Prospero registration number: CRD42020186702.

Keywords: COVID-19; education & training (see medical education & training); journalism (see medical journalism); medical education & training; medical journalism.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Authorship*
  • COVID-19*
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Europe
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Pandemics
  • Periodicals as Topic*
  • SARS-CoV-2