While identification-centric (qualitative) top-down proteomics (TDP) has seen rapid progress in the recent past, the quantification of intact proteoforms within complex proteomes is still challenging. The by far mostly applied approach is label-free quantification, which, however, provides limited multiplexing capacity, and its use in combination with multidimensional separation is encountered with a number of problems. Isobaric labeling, which is a standard quantification approach in bottom-up proteomics, circumvents these limitations. Here, we introduce the application of thiol-directed isobaric labeling for quantitative TDP. For this purpose, we analyzed the labeling efficiency and optimized tandem mass spectrometry parameters for optimal backbone fragmentation for identification and reporter ion formation for quantification. Two different separation schemes, gel-eluted liquid fraction entrapment electrophoresis × liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) and high/low-pH LC-MS, were employed for the analyses of either Escherichia coli (E. coli) proteomes or combined E. coli/yeast samples (two-proteome interference model) to study potential ratio compression. While the thiol-directed labeling introduces a bias in the quantifiable proteoforms, being restricted to Cys-containing proteoforms, our approach showed excellent accuracy in quantification, which is similar to that achievable in bottom-up proteomics. For example, 876 proteoforms could be quantified with high accuracy in an E. coli lysate. The LC-MS data were deposited to the ProteomeXchange with the dataset identifier PXD026310.
Keywords: GElFrEE; LC−MS; isobaric labeling; post-translational modification; proteoform; proteolytic processing; quantitative proteomics; tandem mass tag; terminomics.