Surgical research journals - Under review: An assessment of diversity among editorial boards and outcomes of peer review

Am J Surg. 2021 Dec;222(6):1104-1111. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.09.027. Epub 2021 Sep 29.

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic exposed racism as a public health crisis embedded in structural processes. Editors of surgical research journals pledged their commitment to improve structure and process through increasing diversity in the peer review and editorial process; however, little benchmarking data are available.

Methods: A survey of editorial board members from high impact surgical research journals captured self-identified demographics. Analysis of manuscript submissions from 2016 to 2020 compared acceptance for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI)-focused manuscripts to overall rates.

Results: 25.6% of respondents were female, 2.9% Black, and 3.3% Hispanic. There was variation in the diversity among journals and in the proportion of DEI submissions they attract, but no clear correlation between DEI acceptance rates and board diversity.

Conclusions: Diversity among board members reflects underrepresentation of minorities seen among surgeons nationally. Recruitment and retention of younger individuals, representing more diverse backgrounds, may be a strategy for change. DEI publication rates may benefit from calls for increasing DEI scholarship more so than changes to the peer review process.

Keywords: Diversity; Editorial boards; Gender; Race; Surgical research.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Age Factors
  • Aged
  • Biomedical Research
  • Black or African American / statistics & numerical data
  • Cultural Diversity*
  • Editorial Policies
  • Female
  • General Surgery*
  • Hispanic or Latino / statistics & numerical data
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Peer Review* / methods
  • Periodicals as Topic*
  • Sex Factors
  • United States
  • White People / statistics & numerical data