Reasons for unsuccessful research submissions to JAAPA

JAAPA. 2022 May 1;35(5):54-56. doi: 10.1097/01.JAA.0000824948.31791.0b.

Abstract

Objective: PA authors face many barriers to publication and may benefit from additional transparency in the editorial decision-making process. This study examined the most common reasons for rejection of original research submissions to JAAPA.

Methods: Senior JAAPA editors conducted a thematic analysis of reviewer and editor comments and used these broad themes to classify the reasons for rejection of original research manuscripts submitted to JAAPA.

Results: From October 2015 through December 2018, 77 research manuscripts were submitted to JAAPA. Fifty-six manuscripts were rejected, resulting in an overall rejection rate of 73.7%. Common reasons for rejection included: methodologic issues (55.4%), content outside the journal's scope (42.9%), poor writing quality (17.9%), guideline nonadherence (3.6%), lack of novelty (3.6%), and author(s) declining to revise the manuscript (1.8%).

Conclusion: The most common reasons for manuscript rejection can be overcome through research planning and manuscript preparation.

MeSH terms

  • Editorial Policies*
  • Humans
  • Peer Review, Research*