YouTube-Friend or Foe? A Closer Look at Videos on Inguinal Hernia Surgery as a Source for Patient Education

Abstract

Introduction: The Internet is an extensively used source of medical education by the public. In particular, YouTube is a valuable source of information which can be used to improve patient education. However, there is no quality assurance regime for YouTube videos pertaining to medical education. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the quality and accuracy of videos regarding inguinal hernia repair.

Methods: Two hundred videos were searched for and viewed on YouTube from the phrases: 'inguinal hernia repair,' 'patient information for inguinal hernia repair,' and 'hernia operation.' After the application of predefined exclusion criteria, 23 videos were selected and the following data were collected: number of views, duration since video was posted, and the number of likes, dislikes, and comments. The educational quality was rated using three scoring systems: Health on the Net code, Journal of the American Medical Association, and DISCERN scoring systems. All three scoring systems have been previously used to evaluate online videos; however, they have not been formally validated.

Results: The videos were of low quality when using the Health on the Net code, Journal of the American Medical Association, and DISCERN scoring systems. There was no association between video quality as measured by any of the scoring systems and the number of views. The number of days online was independently predictive of the number of views (P = 0.044) and explained 18% of the variance in views. Likewise, there was no significant association between video quality and video length.

Conclusions: YouTube videos on inguinal hernia repair are of low quality and accuracy. However, the potential of using YouTube to educate patients cannot be ignored.

Keywords: General surgery; Inguinal hernia; Patient education; YouTube.