Technical Success and Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Elastography in Patients with Hepatic Iron Overload

Abstract

Rationale and objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the technical success rate and stiffness measurement reliability of two specific hepatic magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) sequences dedicated to solving susceptibility artifacts in patients with various degrees of hepatic iron overload.

Materials and methods: Thirty-seven patients with iron-overloaded liver confirmed by R2* value measurement who underwent two-dimensional (2D) spin-echo (SE) MRE and 2D SE-echo-planar-imaging (EPI) MRE were reviewed retrospectively. According to four categories based on R2* value (mild, moderate, severe elevation, and extremely severe iron overload), we compared the success rate, quality score, and liver stiffness of the two sequences. In addition, Spearman's correlation was performed to evaluate the relationship between the R2* value and liver stiffness.

Results: The overall success rates of SE MRE and SE-EPI MRE in patients with hepatic iron overload were 91.89% and 78.38%, respectively, and 100% and 78.57%, respectively, for severe elevation iron overload. In all patients, the MRE quality scores were 54 and 48 for SE MRE and SE-EPI MRE, respectively (P = 0.107). There were no significant differences in liver stiffness measurements between the two MRE methods in patients with mild, moderate, and severe elevation iron-overloaded livers (P > 0.6 for all), respectively. For both MRE methods, R2* value had no significant effect on the liver stiffness measurements (correlation coefficient <0.1, P >0.6 for both).

Conclusion: In the mild and moderate elevation iron-overloaded liver, both SE MRE and fast SE-EPI MRE can provide successful and reliable liver stiffness measurement. In severe elevation iron-overloaded livers, SE MRE may be a better choice than SE-EPI MRE.

Keywords: Iron overload; Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE).