A survey of researchers' methods sharing practices and priorities

PeerJ. 2024 Jan 3:12:e16731. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16731. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Missing or inaccessible information about the methods used in scientific research slows the pace of discovery and hampers reproducibility. Yet little is known about how, why, and under what conditions researchers share detailed methods information, or about how such practices vary across social categories like career stage, field, and region. In this exploratory study, we surveyed 997 active researchers about their attitudes and behaviors with respect to methods sharing. The most common approach reported by respondents was private sharing upon request, but a substantial minority (33%) had publicly shared detailed methods information independently of their research findings. The most widely used channels for public sharing were connected to peer-reviewed publications, while the most significant barriers to public sharing were found to be lack of time and lack of awareness about how or where to share. Insofar as respondents were moderately satisfied with their ability to accomplish various goals associated with methods sharing, we conclude that efforts to increase public sharing may wish to focus on enhancing and building awareness of existing solutions-even as future research should seek to understand the needs of methods users and the extent to which they align with prevailing practices of sharing.

Keywords: Methods sharing; Open science; Protocol sharing; Research methods.

MeSH terms

  • Humans
  • Minority Groups*
  • Peer Review*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Research Personnel

Associated data

  • figshare/10.6084/m9.figshare.21334896.v2

Grants and funding

The authors received no funding for this work.