Search Page
Filters
Results by year
Table representation of search results timeline featuring number of search results per year.
Year | Number of Results |
---|---|
1975 | 1 |
1985 | 2 |
1986 | 2 |
1990 | 2 |
1992 | 1 |
1995 | 1 |
1997 | 1 |
1998 | 1 |
1999 | 1 |
2002 | 1 |
2004 | 1 |
2005 | 2 |
2008 | 1 |
2009 | 1 |
2011 | 2 |
2012 | 3 |
2013 | 2 |
2014 | 1 |
2015 | 2 |
2016 | 4 |
2017 | 3 |
2018 | 8 |
2019 | 9 |
2020 | 3 |
2021 | 8 |
2022 | 5 |
2023 | 9 |
2024 | 2 |
Search Results
70 results
Results by year
There were no significant differences in 1-year stent patency rates (ECDS 91.1% vs ERCP 88.1%, P = .52). The ECDS group had significantly higher technical success (ECDS 96.2% vs ERCP 76.3%, P < .001), whereas clinical success was similar (ECDS 93.7% vs ERCP 90.8%
…The mean (SD) procedure time was 14.0 (11.4) minutes for EUS-CDS and 23.1 (15.6) minutes for ERCP-M (P < .01); 40% of the former was performed without fluoroscopy. ...Stent dysfunction occurred in 9.6% vs 9.9% of EUS-CDS and ERCP-M cases, respectively (P = .96).
…The mean (SD) procedure time was 14.0 (11.4) minutes for EUS-CDS and 23.1 (15.6) minutes for ERCP-M (P < .01); 40% of the former w
…Overall (11.3% vs 34.7%, P = .002) and severe adverse events (3.8% vs 19.8%, P = .007) occurred more frequently in the surgical group. In the EUS group, median time to oral intake (0 days [IQR, 0-1] vs 6 days [IQR, 3-7], P < .001) and hospital stay (4.0 da
…