Unraveling the Luminescence Quenching Mechanism in Strong and Weak Quantum-Confined CsPbBr3 Triggered by Triarylamine-Based Hole Transport Layers

Anuraj S Kshirsagar; Katherine A Koch; Ajay Ram Srimath Kandada; Mahesh K Gangishetty

doi:10.1021/jacsau.4c00083

Unraveling the Luminescence Quenching Mechanism in Strong and Weak Quantum-Confined CsPbBr₃ Triggered by Triarylamine-Based Hole Transport Layers

JACS Au. 2024 Mar 6;4(3):1229-1242. doi: 10.1021/jacsau.4c00083. eCollection 2024 Mar 25.

Authors

Anuraj S Kshirsagar¹, Katherine A Koch², Ajay Ram Srimath Kandada², Mahesh K Gangishetty^{1

3}

Affiliations

¹ Department of Chemistry, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi 39762, United States.
² Department of Physics and Center for Functional Materials, Wake Forest University, 2090 Eure Drive, Winston Salem, North Carolina 27109, United States.
³ Department of Physics and Astronomy, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi 39762, United States.

Abstract

Luminescence quenching by hole transport layers (HTLs) is one of the major issues in developing efficient perovskite light-emitting diodes (PeLEDs), which is particularly prominent in blue-emitting devices. While a variety of material systems have been used as interfacial layers, the origin of such quenching and the type of interactions between perovskites and HTLs are still ambiguous. Here, we present a systematic investigation of the luminescence quenching of CsPbBr₃ by a commonly employed hole transport polymer, poly[(9,9-dioctylfluorenyl-2,7diyl)-co-(4,4'-(N-(4-sec-butylphenyl) diphenylamine)] (TFB), in LEDs. Strong and weak quantum-confined CsPbBr₃ (nanoplatelets (NPLs)/nanocrystals (NCs)) are rationally selected to study the quenching mechanism by considering the differences in their morphology, energy level alignments, and quantum confinement. The steady-state and time-resolved Stern-Volmer plots unravel the dominance of dynamic and static quenching at lower and higher concentrations of TFB, respectively, with a maximum quenching efficiency of 98%. The quenching rate in NCs is faster than that in NPLs owing to their longer PL lifetimes and weak quantum confinement. The ultrafast transient absorption results support these dynamics and rule out the involvement of Forster or Dexter energy transfer. Finally, the 1D ¹H and 2D nuclear overhauser effect spectroscopy nuclear magnetic resonance (NOESY NMR) study confirms the exchange of native ligands at the NCs surface with TFB, leading to dark CsPbBr₃-TFB ensemble formation accountable for luminescence quenching. This highlights the critical role of the triarylamine functional group on TFB (also the backbone of many HTLs) in the quenching process. These results shed light on the underlying reasons for the luminescence quenching in PeLEDs and will help to rationally choose the interfacial layers for developing efficient LEDs.