Identification of prognostic factors in patients with brain metastases: a review of 1292 patients
- PMID: 10098435
- DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00442-8
Identification of prognostic factors in patients with brain metastases: a review of 1292 patients
Abstract
Purpose: Prognostic factors in 1292 patients with brain metastases, treated in a single institution were identified in order to determine subgroups of patients suitable for selection in future trials.
Materials and methods: From January 1981 through December 1990, 1292 patients with CT-diagnosed brain metastases were referred to the Department of Radiation Oncology, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam. The majority of patients were treated with whole brain radiotherapy (84%), the remainder were treated with steroids only or surgery and radiotherapy. Information on potential prognostic factors (age, sex, performance status, number and distribution of brain metastases, site of primary tumor, histology, interval between primary tumor and brain metastases, systemic tumor activity, serum lactate dehydrogenase, response to steroid treatment, and treatment modality) was collected. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine significant prognostic factors. Results were compared with literature findings using a review of prognostic factors in 18 published reports.
Results: Overall median survival was 3.4 months, with 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year survival percentages of 36%, 12%, and 4% respectively. Survival was statistically significantly different between treatment modalities, with median survival of 1.3 months in patients treated with steroids only, 3.6 months in patients treated with radiotherapy, and 8.9 months in patients treated with neurosurgery followed by radiotherapy (p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis confirmed literature findings of the major prognostic value of treatment modality on survival of patients with brain metastases. Performance status, response to steroid treatment, systemic tumor activity, and serum lactate dehydrogenase were independent prognostic factors with the strongest impact on survival, second only to treatment modality. Site of primary tumor, age, and number of brain metastases were also identified as prognostic factors in our material, although with lesser importance. In patients with lung primaries, sex was found to have significant impact on survival. In patients with breast primaries, interval between primary tumor and development of brain metastases appeared to be a statistically significant prognostic factor. Histology in patients with lung primaries and distribution of brain metastases were not found to be statistically significant in multivariate analysis.
Conclusions: In this large database, the value of established prognostic factors was confirmed and, furthermore, some less well-recognized parameters such as response to steroid treatment, serum lactate dehydrogenase, age, sex in lung primaries, and site of primary tumor were established. From the three strongest prognostic factors--performance status, response to steroids, and evidence of systemic disease--simple identification of favorable and unfavorable subgroups of patients with brain metastases can be constructed.
Similar articles
-
Diagnosis-specific prognostic factors, indexes, and treatment outcomes for patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases: a multi-institutional analysis of 4,259 patients.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Jul 1;77(3):655-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.025. Epub 2009 Nov 26. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010. PMID: 19942357
-
Survival and prognostic factors in patients with brain metastases from malignant melanoma.Onkologie. 2004 Apr;27(2):145-9. doi: 10.1159/000076903. Onkologie. 2004. PMID: 15138346
-
Prognostic factors and grading systems for overall survival in patients treated with radiosurgery for brain metastases: variation by primary site.J Neurosurg. 2008 Dec;109 Suppl:77-86. doi: 10.3171/JNS/2008/109/12/S13. J Neurosurg. 2008. PMID: 19123892
-
Management of brain metastases: past, present, and future.South Med J. 1994 Dec;87(12):1218-26. doi: 10.1097/00007611-199412000-00005. South Med J. 1994. PMID: 7973921 Review.
-
Clinical efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with brain metastases.Immunotherapy. 2021 Apr;13(5):419-432. doi: 10.2217/imt-2020-0208. Epub 2021 Jan 21. Immunotherapy. 2021. PMID: 33472433 Review.
Cited by
-
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors in Glioblastoma: Current Status and Future Possibilities.Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Feb 15;25(4):2316. doi: 10.3390/ijms25042316. Int J Mol Sci. 2024. PMID: 38396993 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The association between graded prognostic assessment and the prognosis of brain metastases after whole brain radiotherapy: a meta-analysis.Front Oncol. 2024 Jan 9;13:1322262. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1322262. eCollection 2023. Front Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38264750 Free PMC article.
-
Neuroanatomical location of brain metastases from solid tumours based on pathology: An analysis of 511 patients with a comparison to the provided clinical history.PLoS One. 2023 Nov 9;18(11):e0294154. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294154. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37943775 Free PMC article.
-
PACS-Integrated Tools for Peritumoral Edema Volumetrics Provide Additional Information to RANO-BM-Based Assessment of Lung Cancer Brain Metastases after Stereotactic Radiotherapy: A Pilot Study.Cancers (Basel). 2023 Sep 30;15(19):4822. doi: 10.3390/cancers15194822. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37835516 Free PMC article.
-
Dynamic interplay between corticosteroid treatment and the role of SRC-1 gene dysregulation in the progression of WHO-Grade 4 Astrocytoma.J Neurooncol. 2023 Jul;163(3):693-705. doi: 10.1007/s11060-023-04385-5. Epub 2023 Jul 4. J Neurooncol. 2023. PMID: 37402091 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
