This paper describes the data collection methods used in a longitudinal study of the coping strategies of 27 households in three villages in the study area of the MRC/ODA Research Programme on AIDS in Uganda. After pre-testing and piloting, 9 local interviewers made regular visits to the 27 study households over a period of just over one year. The households were purposively selected to represent different household types and socioeconomic status categories. Data were obtained through participant observation using a checklist to ensure systematic collection of data on household activities. Debriefing sessions with the interviewers after the visits provided opportunities for the discussion of the findings and exploration of themes for further study. On the basis of the study findings, and data from the Programme's general study population survey rounds, broad indicators of household 'vulnerability' were identified. A participatory appraisal technique, 'well-being ranking', was used at the end of the study in order to test the viability of the chosen indicators. It is proposed that the example of the research method, which relied on local people not only as interviewers but also as co-investigators in the research, be used to guide future research approaches. The participation of the study community at every stage of research and design, as well as monitoring and evaluation of supportive interventions, is strongly encouraged.
PIP: The authors describe the data collection methods used in a longitudinal study of the coping strategies of 27 households in three villages in the study area of the MRC/ODA Research Program on AIDS in Uganda. The households were selected to represent different types and socioeconomic statuses. After pretesting and piloting, nine local interviewers made regular visits to the study households over a period of slightly longer than one year where they recorded on checklists their observations of participants. Broad indicators of household vulnerability were identified on the basis of study findings and data from the program's general study population survey rounds. The participatory appraisal technique of "well-being ranking" was used at the end of the study to test the viability of the chosen indicators. The authors recommend using this research method which relies upon local people as interviewers as well as co-investigators in the research to guide future research. Participation of the study community at every stage of research, design, monitoring, and evaluation, is strongly encouraged.