Humans use internal models to estimate gravity and linear acceleration
- PMID: 10217143
- DOI: 10.1038/19303
Humans use internal models to estimate gravity and linear acceleration
Abstract
Because sensory systems often provide ambiguous information, neural processes must exist to resolve these ambiguities. It is likely that similar neural processes are used by different sensory systems. For example, many tasks require neural processing to distinguish linear acceleration from gravity, but Einstein's equivalence principle states that all linear accelerometers must measure both linear acceleration and gravity. Here we investigate whether the brain uses internal models, defined as neural systems that mimic physical principles, to help estimate linear acceleration and gravity. Internal models may be used in motor contro, sensorimotor integration and sensory processing, but direct experimental evidence for such models is limited. To determine how humans process ambiguous gravity and linear acceleration cues, subjects were tilted after being rotated at a constant velocity about an Earth-vertical axis. We show that the eye movements evoked by this post-rotational tilt include a response component that compensates for the estimated linear acceleration even when no actual linear acceleration occurs. These measured responses are consistent with our internal model predictions that the nervous system can develop a non-zero estimate of linear acceleration even when no true linear acceleration is present.
Similar articles
-
Neural processing of gravito-inertial cues in humans. IV. Influence of visual rotational cues during roll optokinetic stimuli.J Neurophysiol. 2003 Jan;89(1):390-400. doi: 10.1152/jn.00513.2001. J Neurophysiol. 2003. PMID: 12522188
-
Neural processing of gravito-inertial cues in humans. I. Influence of the semicircular canals following post-rotatory tilt.J Neurophysiol. 2000 Oct;84(4):2001-15. doi: 10.1152/jn.2000.84.4.2001. J Neurophysiol. 2000. PMID: 11024093
-
Vestibular perception and action employ qualitatively different mechanisms. II. VOR and perceptual responses during combined Tilt&Translation.J Neurophysiol. 2005 Jul;94(1):199-205. doi: 10.1152/jn.00905.2004. Epub 2005 Feb 23. J Neurophysiol. 2005. PMID: 15730979
-
Gravity or translation: central processing of vestibular signals to detect motion or tilt.J Vestib Res. 2003;13(4-6):245-53. J Vestib Res. 2003. PMID: 15096668 Review.
-
Coordinate transformations and sensory integration in the detection of spatial orientation and self-motion: from models to experiments.Prog Brain Res. 2007;165:155-80. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)65010-3. Prog Brain Res. 2007. PMID: 17925245 Review.
Cited by
-
Sensorimotor and cognitive factors associated with the age-related increase of visual field dependence: a cross-sectional study.Age (Dordr). 2015 Aug;37(4):9805. doi: 10.1007/s11357-015-9805-x. Epub 2015 Jun 30. Age (Dordr). 2015. PMID: 26122710 Free PMC article.
-
[Diagnosis of otolith function and estimation of subjective visual vertical].HNO. 2012 Apr;60(4):327-9. doi: 10.1007/s00106-012-2502-5. HNO. 2012. PMID: 22491881 German. No abstract available.
-
Direction of balance and perception of the upright are perceptually dissociable.J Neurophysiol. 2015 Jun 1;113(10):3600-9. doi: 10.1152/jn.00737.2014. Epub 2015 Mar 11. J Neurophysiol. 2015. PMID: 25761954 Free PMC article.
-
Bridging the gap between theories of sensory cue integration and the physiology of multisensory neurons.Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013 Jun;14(6):429-42. doi: 10.1038/nrn3503. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013. PMID: 23686172 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The otolith vermis: A systems neuroscience theory of the Nodulus and Uvula.Front Syst Neurosci. 2022 Sep 15;16:886284. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2022.886284. eCollection 2022. Front Syst Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 36185824 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
