Background: The honeycomb-shaped dystrophy of Thiel and Behnke has been misunderstood for a long time and has erroneously been classified as Reis-Bücklers' dystrophy. The mistake originates in historical misunderstandings concerning the interpretation of the original Reis-Bücklers' dystrophy which results in a nonuniform nomenclature and a permanent confusion in the evaluation of the superficial stroma dystrophies. This paper intends to clarify the original identity of the honeycomb corneal dystrophy and to distinguish it from the Reis-Bücklers' dystrophy.
Patients and methods: We examined seven patients of the original family of Thiel and Behnke. Five of them were newly detected, two of them were reexamined. The histological findings were reevaluated, and the diagnosis was proved by electron microscopic study of corneal specimens.
Results: The honeycomb dystrophy is characterized by: (1) dominant inheritance, (2) early manifestation, (3) slow progression, (4) painful erosions during childhood, (5) subepithelial corneal opacities with a clear limbal zone, (6) honeycomb-shaped opacity pattern, (7) recurrence in the graft following keratoplasty, (8) subepithelial fibrous tissue in wave-like accumulation in histologic sections, (9) curly filaments observed by electron microscopy. The clinical symptoms hardly differ from those of Reis-Bücklers' dystrophy. The histological appearance, however, is clearly distinct and curly filaments are the pathognomonic ultrastructural features.
Conclusions: The honeycomb dystrophy represents a definite corneal disease. The terms "Reis-Bücklers' dystrophy" and "ring dystrophy" used for it up to now are wrong and should be eliminated in this context. The only correct term of the disease is honeycomb-shaped dystrophy (Thiel-Behnke) according to its first description and major clinical features. The eponym Reis-Bücklers' dystrophy should only be used for the corneal dystrophy described by Reis and Bücklers.