[No consensus on the definition, diagnosis and treatment of habitual abortion in the Netherlands]

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1999 Apr 24;143(17):897-902.
[Article in Dutch]

Abstract

Objective: To review the current policy in diagnosis and treatment of recurrent miscarriage in the Netherlands.

Design: Cross-sectional survey.

Method: A printed questionnaire was sent in 1996 to all 125 departments of gynaecology in the Netherlands with questions about definition, investigation and therapy of recurrent miscarriage.

Results: The response rate was 90% (n = 112). Twenty-nine per cent of the respondents defined recurrent miscarriage as having two or more abortions and 71% as three or more abortions. In 42% of the departments a diagnostic protocol for recurrent miscarriage was present. Diagnostic investigations most frequently performed were vaginal ultrasound (79%), parental chromosome analysis (78%), thyroid-stimulating hormone (72%), lupus anticoagulant (69%), blood glucose (65%), hysterosalpingography (56%) and anticardiolipin antibodies (IgG, IgM) (56%). Therapy most frequently applied was prescription of folic acid (53%).

Conclusion: The definition of recurrent miscarriage differed. Uncertainty about a rational diagnostic approach was evident from the large number of tests requested by 20-50% of the respondents. Some diagnostic tests like immunological investigation and search for infectious factors were not followed by a therapeutical intervention.

Publication types

  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Abortion, Habitual / diagnosis*
  • Abortion, Habitual / therapy*
  • Adult
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Diagnostic Techniques, Obstetrical and Gynecological / statistics & numerical data
  • Female
  • Folic Acid / therapeutic use*
  • Gynecology / standards*
  • Health Care Surveys
  • Humans
  • Netherlands
  • Policy Making
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians'*
  • Pregnancy
  • Unnecessary Procedures*

Substances

  • Folic Acid