Irrigating solution and pressure effects on tooth sectioning with surgical burs

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999 May;87(5):552-6. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(99)70132-0.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of the applied load on the handpiece, type of cooling agent, and type of tooth on surgical tooth dissection with a tapered crosscut fissure bur.

Study design: Cutting studies were performed at handpiece loadings of 295 and 590 g through use of an oral surgery straight handpiece, tapered crosscut fissure burs, and an established cutting regimen. Extracted molars were dissected under irrigation with water, 0.9% saline solution, and lactated Ringer's solution at constant flow rates of 15 and 25 mL/min. Cutting efficiencies were analyzed by 1-way analysis of variance and Scheffé tests.

Results: No difference in cutting efficiency was found at low loads under irrigation with water or saline solution, but under irrigation with lactated Ringer's solution, a higher cutting efficiency was found (P < .05). There was no difference in cutting efficiency for lactated Ringer's solution and saline solution at high loads, but both cut more efficiently than water (P < .01).

Conclusions: Saline solution is a useful coolant/irrigant for the dissection of teeth under most conditions, but lactated Ringer's solution might be beneficial with respect to cutting efficiency when lower handpiece loads are required.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Analysis of Variance
  • Dental High-Speed Equipment
  • Dental Stress Analysis*
  • Dissection / instrumentation*
  • Humans
  • Isotonic Solutions
  • Molar / surgery*
  • Ringer's Solution
  • Sodium Chloride
  • Therapeutic Irrigation
  • Water

Substances

  • Isotonic Solutions
  • Water
  • Sodium Chloride
  • Ringer's Solution