Comparison of polydioxanone (PDS) and polypropylene (Prolene) for Shouldice repair of primary inguinal hernias: a prospective randomised trial

Eur J Surg. 1999 Apr;165(4):333-8. doi: 10.1080/110241599750006866.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the recurrence rates after Shouldice operation for primary inguinal hernias, using non-absorbable polypropylene or absorbable polydioxanone suture material.

Design: Randomised, controlled trial.

Setting: Teaching hospital, Germany.

Subjects: 220 male patients who had 233 elective Shouldice repairs of primary inguinal hernias, 201 of whom were followed up.

Intervention: Standard Shouldice procedure with 2/0 polypropylene (Prolene, n = 98) or 2/0 polydioxanone (PDS, n = 103).

Main outcome measures: Recurrence rates after a minimum follow-up of 24 months (range 24-48, mean 31).

Results: Numbers of early complications were similar in the two groups; there were 2 wound infections in each. A total of 193 patients with 201 repairs had a documented follow-up (86%). There were 6 recurrences in the PDS group and 5 in the Prolene group, giving a total recurrence rate of 5%. This difference was not significant (Fisher's exact test, p = 1.0).

Conclusion: Recurrence rates in both groups were higher than expected, but there was no difference between the two groups.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Absorbable Implants
  • Elective Surgical Procedures / methods*
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Hernia, Inguinal / epidemiology
  • Hernia, Inguinal / surgery*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Polydioxanone*
  • Polypropylenes*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Recurrence
  • Sutures*
  • Time Factors

Substances

  • Polypropylenes
  • Polydioxanone