Objective: To compare reproductive benefits of hysteroscopic myomectomy and polypectomy for infertility to outcomes in infertile couples with normal hysteroscopic findings.
Methods: Women with diagnoses of infertility who had hysteroscopic evaluations by a single surgeon between 1975 and 1996 were sent a routine follow-up questionnaire regarding their reproductive histories. All 92 subjects who were located responded to the questionnaire, and 78 met inclusion criteria: age under 45 years, at least 12 months of infertility, and at least 18 months of follow-up with attempts to conceive, including in vitro fertilization in women with bilateral tubal occlusion.
Results: Of the 78 subjects, 36 had myomectomies, 23 had polypectomies, and 19 had normal cavities. Among the three groups, there were no significant differences in age, type of infertility, length of infertility, or follow-up after the procedure. Polypectomy subjects had significantly higher pregnancy and live birth rates than women with normal cavities. Women who had myomectomies larger than 2 cm had significantly higher pregnancy and live birth rates, achieving statistical significance at a myoma size of 3 cm or greater for live births. Spontaneous abortion rates among first pregnancies after myomectomy, polypectomy, or normal study were similar: 31.5%, 27.7%, and 37.5%, respectively.
Conclusion: Both hysteroscopic polypectomy and hysteroscopic myomectomy appeared to enhance fertility compared with infertile women with normal cavities. Despite concern that hysteroscopic resection of a large myoma might ablate a large surface area of the endometrial cavity, the reproductive benefit appears greater than the risk.