Is there a role for digital rectal examination in the followup of patients after radical prostatectomy?

J Urol. 1999 Sep;162(3 Pt 1):762-4. doi: 10.1097/00005392-199909010-00037.

Abstract

Purpose: We determine the role of digital rectal examination in the followup of patients after radical prostatectomy.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed data on 501 consecutive patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy between 1992 and 1998, and were followed at the University of Miami. Patients were evaluated at 3 to 6-month intervals after surgery with serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) and digital rectal examination. Biochemical recurrence was defined as PSA greater than 0.2 ng./ml. and increasing on at least 2 consecutive measurements. Local recurrence, detected by an abnormal digital rectal examination, was defined as an induration or nodularity in the prostatic fossa.

Results: Mean followup plus or minus standard deviation was 25.4+/-20.8 months. Disease recurred in 72 patients (14.4%) and was biochemical in all. An abnormal digital rectal examination was noted in 4 patients, none of whom had an undetectable PSA at the time of a palpable abnormality.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that an abnormal digital rectal examination after radical prostatectomy is always associated with a detectable PSA, which implies that performing a digital rectal examination in the absence of a detectable PSA may not be necessary.

MeSH terms

  • Adenocarcinoma / surgery*
  • Aged
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local / diagnosis*
  • Palpation*
  • Prostatectomy*
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Rectum
  • Retrospective Studies