Medial efferent effects on auditory-nerve responses to tail-frequency tones. I. Rate reduction
- PMID: 10462791
- DOI: 10.1121/1.427102
Medial efferent effects on auditory-nerve responses to tail-frequency tones. I. Rate reduction
Abstract
One way medial efferents are thought to inhibit responses of auditory-nerve fibers (ANFs) is by reducing the gain of the cochlear amplifier thereby reducing motion of the basilar membrane. If this is the only mechanism of medial efferent inhibition, then medial efferents would not be expected to inhibit responses where the cochlear amplifier has little effect, i.e., at sound frequencies in the tails of tuning curves. Inhibition at tail frequencies was tested for by obtaining randomized rate-level functions from cat ANFs with high characteristic frequencies (CF > or = 5 kHz), stimulated with tones two or more octaves below CF. It was found that electrical stimulation of medial efferents can indeed inhibit ANF responses to tail-frequency tones. The amplitude of efferent inhibition depended on both sound level (largest near to threshold) and frequency (largest two to three octaves below CF). On average, inhibition of high-CF ANFs responding to 1 kHz tones was around 5 dB. Although an efferent reduction of basilar-membrane motion cannot be ruled out as the mechanism producing the inhibition of ANF responses to tail frequency tones, it seems more likely that efferents produce this effect by changing the micromechanics of the cochlear partition.
Similar articles
-
Effects of electrical stimulation of efferent olivocochlear neurons on cat auditory-nerve fibers. III. Tuning curves and thresholds at CF.Hear Res. 1988 Dec;37(1):29-45. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(88)90075-5. Hear Res. 1988. PMID: 3225230
-
Medial efferent effects on auditory-nerve responses to tail-frequency tones II: alteration of phase.J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Aug;108(2):664-78. doi: 10.1121/1.429599. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000. PMID: 10955633
-
Non-tip auditory-nerve responses that are suppressed by low-frequency bias tones originate from reticular lamina motion.Hear Res. 2018 Feb;358:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.12.008. Epub 2017 Dec 14. Hear Res. 2018. PMID: 29276975 Free PMC article.
-
Basilar membrane motion in relation to two-tone suppression.Hear Res. 1998 Jan;115(1-2):129-42. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5955(97)00187-1. Hear Res. 1998. PMID: 9472742 Review.
-
Quantifying 2-factor phase relations in non-linear responses from low characteristic-frequency auditory-nerve fibers.Hear Res. 1995 Oct;90(1-2):126-38. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(95)00154-7. Hear Res. 1995. PMID: 8974990 Review.
Cited by
-
Separate mechanical processes underlie fast and slow effects of medial olivocochlear efferent activity.J Physiol. 2003 Apr 1;548(Pt 1):307-12. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.039081. Epub 2003 Feb 28. J Physiol. 2003. PMID: 12611913 Free PMC article.
-
How are inner hair cells stimulated? Evidence for multiple mechanical drives.Hear Res. 2012 Oct;292(1-2):35-50. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.08.005. Epub 2012 Aug 24. Hear Res. 2012. PMID: 22959529 Free PMC article.
-
Cochlear amplification and tuning depend on the cellular arrangement within the organ of Corti.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 May 29;115(22):5762-5767. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1720979115. Epub 2018 May 14. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018. PMID: 29760098 Free PMC article.
-
Medial olivocochlear efferent inhibition of basilar-membrane responses to clicks: evidence for two modes of cochlear mechanical excitation.J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Aug;124(2):1080-92. doi: 10.1121/1.2949435. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008. PMID: 18681598 Free PMC article.
-
An analysis of cochlear response harmonics: Contribution of neural excitation.J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Nov;138(5):2957-63. doi: 10.1121/1.4934556. J Acoust Soc Am. 2015. PMID: 26627769 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
