Public conceptions of mental illness: labels, causes, dangerousness, and social distance

Am J Public Health. 1999 Sep;89(9):1328-33. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.9.1328.

Abstract

Objectives: The authors used nationwide survey data to characterize current public conceptions related to recognition of mental illness and perceived causes, dangerousness, and desired social distance.

Methods: Data were derived from a vignette experiment included in the 1996 General Social Survey. Respondents (n = 1444) were randomly assigned to 1 of 5 vignette conditions. Four vignettes described psychiatric disorders meeting diagnostic criteria, and the fifth depicted a "troubled person" with subclinical problems and worries.

Results: Results indicate that the majority of the public identifies schizophrenia (88%) and major depression (69%) as mental illnesses and that most report multicausal explanations combining stressful circumstances with biologic and genetic factors. Results also show, however, that smaller proportions associate alcohol (49%) or drug (44%) abuse with mental illness and that symptoms of mental illness remain strongly connected with public fears about potential violence and with a desire for limited social interaction.

Conclusions: While there is reason for optimism in the public's recognition of mental illness and causal attributions, a strong stereotype of dangerousness and desire for social distance persist. These latter conceptions are likely to negatively affect people with mental illness.

MeSH terms

  • Analysis of Variance
  • Attitude to Health*
  • Causality
  • Dangerous Behavior*
  • Data Collection
  • Fear
  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
  • Humans
  • Likelihood Functions
  • Mental Disorders / diagnosis*
  • Mental Disorders / etiology*
  • Mental Disorders / prevention & control
  • Mental Disorders / psychology
  • Prejudice
  • Social Distance*
  • Stereotyping*
  • Substance-Related Disorders / complications
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • United States