The effect of genotype, age, sex, and caste on response thresholds to sucrose and foraging behavior of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.)
- PMID: 10488557
- DOI: 10.1007/s003590050379
The effect of genotype, age, sex, and caste on response thresholds to sucrose and foraging behavior of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.)
Abstract
Bees derived from artificially selected high- and low-pollen-hoarding strains were tested for their proboscis extension reflex response to water and varying sucrose concentrations. High-strain bees had a lower response threshold to sucrose than low-strain bees among pre-foragers, foragers, queens and drones. Pre-foraging low-strain workers showed ontogenetic changes in their response threshold to sucrose which was inversely related to age. High-strain foragers were more likely to return with loads of water compared to low-strain foragers. Whereas low-strain foragers were more likely to return with loads of nectar. Low-strain nectar foragers collected nectar with significantly higher sucrose concentrations than did the high-strain nectar foragers. Alternatively, low-strain foragers were more likely to return empty compared to high-strain foragers. These studies demonstrate how a genotypically varied sensory-physiological process, the perception of sucrose, are associated with a division of labor for foraging.
Similar articles
-
The effect of genotype on response thresholds to sucrose and foraging behavior of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.).J Comp Physiol A. 1998 Apr;182(4):489-500. doi: 10.1007/s003590050196. J Comp Physiol A. 1998. PMID: 9565478
-
The effects of foraging role and genotype on light and sucrose responsiveness in honey bees (Apis mellifera L.).Behav Brain Res. 2009 Dec 14;205(1):132-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.07.022. Epub 2009 Jul 28. Behav Brain Res. 2009. PMID: 19643145
-
The effects of genotype, foraging role, and sucrose responsiveness on the tactile learning performance of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.).Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2001 Sep;76(2):138-50. doi: 10.1006/nlme.2000.3996. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2001. PMID: 11502146
-
8. The development and evolution of division of labor and foraging specialization in a social insect (Apis mellifera L.).Curr Top Dev Biol. 2006;74:253-86. doi: 10.1016/S0070-2153(06)74008-X. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2006. PMID: 16860670 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Nutritional Physiology and Ecology of Honey Bees.Annu Rev Entomol. 2018 Jan 7;63:327-344. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-020117-043423. Epub 2017 Oct 13. Annu Rev Entomol. 2018. PMID: 29029590 Review.
Cited by
-
Mixing of honeybees with different genotypes affects individual worker behavior and transcription of genes in the neuronal substrate.PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031653. Epub 2012 Feb 14. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 22348118 Free PMC article.
-
Tachykinin signaling inhibits task-specific behavioral responsiveness in honeybee workers.Elife. 2021 Mar 24;10:e64830. doi: 10.7554/eLife.64830. Elife. 2021. PMID: 33760729 Free PMC article.
-
Downregulation of vitellogenin gene activity increases the gustatory responsiveness of honey bee workers (Apis mellifera).Behav Brain Res. 2006 May 15;169(2):201-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.01.006. Epub 2006 Feb 8. Behav Brain Res. 2006. PMID: 16466813 Free PMC article.
-
Viral species differentially influence macronutrient preferences based on honey bee genotype.Biol Open. 2022 Oct 15;11(10):bio059039. doi: 10.1242/bio.059039. Epub 2022 Sep 29. Biol Open. 2022. PMID: 36082847 Free PMC article.
-
Experiential effects of appetitive and nonappetitive odors on feeding behavior in the blowfly, Phormia regina: a putative role for tyramine in appetite regulation.J Neurosci. 2005 Aug 17;25(33):7507-16. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1862-05.2005. J Neurosci. 2005. PMID: 16107638 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources
Medical