Internal consistency and validity of an observational method for assessing disability in mobility in patients with osteoarthritis

Arthritis Care Res. 1999 Feb;12(1):19-25. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199902)12:1<19::aid-art4>3.0.co;2-v.

Abstract

Objective: To establish the internal consistency and validity of an observational method for assessing disability in mobility in patients with osteoarthritis (OA).

Methods: Data were obtained from 198 patients with OA of the hip or knee. Results of the observational method were compared with results of self-report methods (questionnaires) on disability in mobility.

Results: Both Cronbach's alpha and Mokken Scale Analysis indicate that the method is internally consistent. Using factor analysis, observed and self-reported disability in mobility were found to be closely associated and could not be differentiated.

Conclusions: The observational method is internally consistent and indeed measures disability in mobility (high convergent validity), but observations and self-report seem to yield largely equivalent information (low divergent validity). This raises questions regarding the simultaneous use of both observational and self-report methods in the assessment of disability in mobility in OA patients.

MeSH terms

  • Activities of Daily Living*
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Disabled Persons / classification*
  • Factor Analysis, Statistical
  • Female
  • Geriatric Assessment*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Osteoarthritis / physiopathology*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Surveys and Questionnaires