Laparoscopic or Lichtenstein repair for recurrent inguinal hernia: one unit's experience

J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1999 Oct;44(5):301-2.

Abstract

Surgical treatment of recurrent inguinal hernia is controversial. This is a prospective study of 50 patients who had laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair (n = 25) or Lichtenstein repair (n = 25) for recurrent inguinal hernia. The two groups of patients were comparable in age, sex and type of hernia. Post-operatively, a seroma or a wound haematoma developed in 12 patients after Lichtenstein repair and in 4 patients after laparoscopic repair (p < 0.05). On average, analgesia was taken for 6.4 days after Lichtenstein repair compared with 3.4 days after laparoscopic repair (p < 0.05). In our unit, laparoscopic repair was associated with fewer complications and a significantly shorter duration of post-operative analgesia than Lichtenstein repair for recurrent inguinal hernia.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Controlled Clinical Trial
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Hematoma / etiology
  • Hernia, Inguinal / pathology
  • Hernia, Inguinal / surgery*
  • Humans
  • Laparoscopy*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Prospective Studies
  • Recurrence
  • Treatment Outcome