Towards a pain-free venepuncture

Anaesthesia. 2000 Mar;55(3):260-2. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2000.01124.x.

Abstract

A randomised, prospective trial was conducted to assess the efficacy of various means of alleviating the pain of subcutaneous lidocaine infiltration. One hundred and twenty-two patients were randomly allocated to different groups to receive buffered lidocaine 1%, warmed lidocaine 1% or infiltration by the counter-irritation technique. A visual analogue pain score was recorded at different stages of cannulation and results showed that pain scores were significantly lower in the group receiving buffered lidocaine 1% (p < 0.02) and in the counter-irritation group (p < 0.05). Thus buffering lidocaine 1% and administration of lidocaine 1% by the counter-irritation technique is effective in relieving the pain of lidocaine infiltration.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Anesthesia, Local / methods*
  • Anesthetics, Local / administration & dosage*
  • Catheterization, Peripheral / methods
  • Humans
  • Lidocaine / administration & dosage*
  • Pain / prevention & control*
  • Pain Measurement
  • Prospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Anesthetics, Local
  • Lidocaine