Increased risk of early pregnancy loss by profound suppression of luteinizing hormone during ovarian stimulation in normogonadotrophic women undergoing assisted reproduction
- PMID: 10783342
- DOI: 10.1093/humrep/15.5.1003
Increased risk of early pregnancy loss by profound suppression of luteinizing hormone during ovarian stimulation in normogonadotrophic women undergoing assisted reproduction
Abstract
The impact of suppressed concentrations of circulating luteinizing hormone (LH) during ovarian stimulation on the outcome of in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment in 200 consecutive, normogonadotrophic women (couples) was analysed retrospectively. A standard stimulation protocol with mid-luteal gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist down-regulation and ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) was used in all cases. Blood was sampled from each woman on stimulation days 1 and 8 for analysis of oestradiol and LH in serum. A threshold value of serum LH of 0.5 IU/l on stimulation day 8 (S8) was chosen to discriminate between women with low or 'normal' LH concentrations. Low concentrations of LH on S8 (<0.5 IU/l) were found in 49% (98/200) of the women. This group of women was comparable with the normal LH group with regard to pre-treatment clinical parameters, and to the parameters characterizing the stimulation protocol with the exception of serum oestradiol concentration, which on S8 was significantly lower than in the normal LH group (P < 0.001). The proportion of positive pregnancy tests was similar in the two groups (30% versus 34% per started cycle), but the final clinical treatment outcome was significantly different, with a five-fold higher risk of early pregnancy loss (45% versus 9%; P < 0.005) in the low LH group and consequently a significantly poorer chance of delivery than in the normal LH group. It is concluded that a substantial proportion of normogonadotrophic women treated with GnRH agonist down-regulation in combination with FSH, devoid of LH activity, experience LH suppression, which compromises the treatment outcome. Whether these women would benefit from supplementation with recombinant LH or human menopausal gonadotrophin during ovarian stimulation, remains to be proven in the future by prospective randomized trials.
Comment in
-
Subgroup analyses in Orgalutran trials.Hum Reprod. 2001 Dec;16(12):2726. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.12.2726-a. Hum Reprod. 2001. PMID: 11726603 No abstract available.
-
The potential value of mid-follicular phase LH.Hum Reprod. 2002 Feb;17(2):517-20. doi: 10.1093/humrep/17.2.517-a. Hum Reprod. 2002. PMID: 11821305 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Suppression of LH during ovarian stimulation: analysing threshold values and effects on ovarian response and the outcome of assisted reproduction in down-regulated women stimulated with recombinant FSH.Hum Reprod. 2001 Aug;16(8):1636-43. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.8.1636. Hum Reprod. 2001. PMID: 11473955
-
LH serum levels during ovarian stimulation as predictors of ovarian response and assisted reproduction outcome in down-regulated women stimulated with recombinant FSH.Hum Reprod. 2003 Dec;18(12):2689-97. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deg506. Hum Reprod. 2003. PMID: 14645193
-
The effect of human menopausal gonadotrophin and highly purified, urine-derived follicle stimulating hormone on the outcome of in-vitro fertilization in down-regulated normogonadotrophic women.Hum Reprod. 1996 Jun;11(6):1209-13. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019357. Hum Reprod. 1996. PMID: 8671425 Clinical Trial.
-
The role of gonadotropins in follicular development and their use in ovulation induction protocols for assisted reproduction.Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2000 Jun;5(2):157-67. doi: 10.1080/13625180008500389. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2000. PMID: 10943580 Review.
-
Outlook: who needs LH in ovarian stimulation?Reprod Biomed Online. 2006 May;12(5):599-607. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61186-8. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006. PMID: 16790105 Review.
Cited by
-
Association between serum LH levels on hCG trigger day and live birth rate after fresh embryo transfer with GnRH antagonist regimen in different populations.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Jul 5;14:1191827. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1191827. eCollection 2023. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023. PMID: 37476498 Free PMC article.
-
LH level on ovulation trigger day has a different impact on the outcomes of agonist and antagonist regimens during in vitro fertilization.J Ovarian Res. 2023 Jan 27;16(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13048-023-01110-8. J Ovarian Res. 2023. PMID: 36707867 Free PMC article.
-
Assisted Reproductive Technology without Embryo Discarding or Freezing in Women ≥40 Years: A 5-Year Retrospective Study at a Single Center in Italy.J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 7;12(2):504. doi: 10.3390/jcm12020504. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 36675433 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Exogenous Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Supplementation on Clinical Pregnancy of Patients Receiving Long-Acting Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist (GnRHa) Cycles: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Int J Womens Health. 2022 Dec 13;14:1691-1700. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S388726. eCollection 2022. Int J Womens Health. 2022. PMID: 36536609 Free PMC article.
-
Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol with or without clomiphene citrate for poor ovarian responders: a retrospective cohort study.BMC Womens Health. 2022 Dec 17;22(1):527. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-02126-w. BMC Womens Health. 2022. PMID: 36528555 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
