Determinants of patient satisfaction and willingness to return with emergency care
- PMID: 10783404
Determinants of patient satisfaction and willingness to return with emergency care
Abstract
Study objective: To identify emergency department process of care measures that are significantly associated with satisfaction and willingness to return.
Methods: Patient satisfaction and willingness to return at 5 urban, teaching hospital EDs were assessed. Baseline questionnaire, chart review, and 10-day follow-up telephone interviews were performed, and 38 process of care measures and 30 patient characteristic were collected for each respondent. Overall satisfaction was modeled with ordinal logistic regression. Willingness to return was modeled with logistic regression.
Results: During a 1-month study period, 2,899 (84% of eligible) on-site questionnaires were completed. Telephone interviews were completed by 2,333 patients (80% of patients who completed a questionnaire). Patient-reported problems that were highly correlated with satisfaction included help not received when needed (odds ratio [OR] 0.345; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.261 to 0.456), poor explanation of causes of problem (OR 0.434; 95% CI 0.345 to 0.546), not told about potential wait time (OR 0.479; 95% CI 0.399 to 0.577), not told when to resume normal activities (OR 0.691; 95% CI 0.531 to 0.901), poor explanation of test results (OR 0.647; 95% CI 0.495 to 0.845), and not told when to return to the ED (OR 0.656; 95% CI 0. 494 to 0.871). Other process of care measures correlated with satisfaction include nonacute triage status (OR 0.701, 95% CI 0.578 to 0.851) and number of treatments in the ED (OR 1.164 per treatment; 95% CI 1.073 to 1.263). Patient characteristics that significantly predicted less satisfaction included younger age and black race. Determinants of willingness to return include poor explanation of causes of problem (OR 0.328; 95% CI 0.217 to 0.495), unable to leave a message for family (OR 0.391; 95% CI 0.226 to 0. 677), not told about potential wait time (OR 0.561; 95% CI 0.381 to 0.825), poor explanation of test results (OR 0.541; 95% CI 0.347 to 0.846), and help not received when needed (OR 0.537; 95% CI 0.340 to 0.846). Patients with a chief complaint of hand laceration were less willing to return compared with a reference population of patients with abdominal pain. Willingness to return is strongly predicted by overall satisfaction (OR 2.601; 95% CI 2.292 to 2.951).
Conclusion: These data identify specific process of care measures that are determinants of patient satisfaction and willingness to return. Efforts to increase patient satisfaction and willingness to return should focus on improving ED performance on these identified process measures.
Comment in
-
Emergency department customer satisfaction: the point of view paradox.Ann Emerg Med. 2000 May;35(5):499-501. Ann Emerg Med. 2000. PMID: 10783411 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Validating a model of patient satisfaction with emergency care.Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Nov;38(5):527-32. doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.119250. Ann Emerg Med. 2001. PMID: 11679864
-
Developing an efficient model to select emergency department patient satisfaction improvement strategies.Ann Emerg Med. 2005 Jul;46(1):3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.11.023. Ann Emerg Med. 2005. PMID: 15988417
-
Antibiotic prescriptions are associated with increased patient satisfaction with emergency department visits for acute respiratory tract infections.Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Oct;16(10):934-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00522.x. Acad Emerg Med. 2009. PMID: 19799568 Clinical Trial.
-
Emergency department crowding is associated with poor care for patients with severe pain.Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Jan;51(1):1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.07.008. Epub 2007 Oct 25. Ann Emerg Med. 2008. PMID: 17913299
-
Characteristics that distinguish adolescents who present to a children's hospital emergency department from those presenting to a general emergency department.Pediatr Emerg Care. 2009 Jun;25(6):376-9. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181a7924f. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2009. PMID: 19458563
Cited by
-
Subjective experiences of an acceptance and mindfulness-based group intervention (Feel-Good-Group) in young people with early psychosis.Front Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 7;15:1369629. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1369629. eCollection 2024. Front Psychiatry. 2024. PMID: 39435124 Free PMC article.
-
Identifying Facilitators and Inhibitors of Shared Understanding: An Ethnography of Diagnosis Communication in Acute Medical Settings.Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14180. doi: 10.1111/hex.14180. Health Expect. 2024. PMID: 39180375 Free PMC article.
-
Compassion Fatigue in Emergency Medicine: Current Perspectives.Open Access Emerg Med. 2024 Jul 12;16:167-181. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S418935. eCollection 2024. Open Access Emerg Med. 2024. PMID: 39045605 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Patient perceptions of ICU physiotherapy: 'Your body needs to go somewhere to be recharged … '.South Afr J Crit Care. 2023 Dec 13;39(3):e1092. doi: 10.7196/SAJCC.2023.v39i3.1092. eCollection 2023. South Afr J Crit Care. 2023. PMID: 38357692 Free PMC article.
-
Medical Admission Prediction Score (MAPS); a simple tool to predict medical admissions in the emergency department.PLoS One. 2023 Nov 10;18(11):e0293140. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293140. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37948401 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
