Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review

Psychol Bull. 2000 May;126(3):390-423. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390.

Abstract

Common maxims about beauty suggest that attractiveness is not important in life. In contrast, both fitness-related evolutionary theory and socialization theory suggest that attractiveness influences development and interaction. In 11 meta-analyses, the authors evaluate these contradictory claims, demonstrating that (a) raters agree about who is and is not attractive, both within and across cultures; (b) attractive children and adults are judged more positively than unattractive children and adults, even by those who know them; (c) attractive children and adults are treated more positively than unattractive children and adults, even by those who know them; and (d) attractive children and adults exhibit more positive behaviors and traits than unattractive children and adults. Results are used to evaluate social and fitness-related evolutionary theories and the veracity of maxims about beauty.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Animals
  • Beauty*
  • Biological Evolution
  • Child
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Interpersonal Relations
  • Male
  • Self Concept
  • Social Behavior*
  • Social Perception*