Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2000 Jun;118(6):819-25.
doi: 10.1001/archopht.118.6.819.

Causes of blindness and visual impairment in a population of older Americans: The Salisbury Eye Evaluation Study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Causes of blindness and visual impairment in a population of older Americans: The Salisbury Eye Evaluation Study

B Muñoz et al. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the causes of blindness and visual impairment in a population-based sample of older Americans.

Methods: A random sample of 3821 residents of Salisbury, Md, between the ages of 65 and 84 years was identified from Medicare records. Sixty-six percent (2520 persons) agreed to undergo an eye examination; 26% of the participants were African American. The clinical examination included acuity testing with an Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart and standardized refraction testing for those with a visual acuity worse than 20/30, slitlamp and dilated retinal examination by an ophthalmologist, tonometry, lens and fundus photography, and a suprathreshold visual field test. Visual impairment was defined as a best-corrected acuity in the better-seeing eye worse than 20/40 and better than 20/200, while blindness was acuity in the better-seeing eye of 20/200 or worse. For those with a visual acuity worse than 20/40 in either eye, one or more causes were assigned by an ophthalmologist and a final cause for each eye was confirmed by a panel of 3 subspecialty ophthalmologists (O.D.S., H.A.Q., and S.B.B.) based on all available evidence.

Results: Bilateral presenting acuity worse than 20/40 increased from 4% in the 65- to 74-year age group to 16% in the 80- to 84-year age group. One third of those with presenting acuity worse than 20/40 improved to 20/40 or better with refraction. Overall, 4.5% had a best-corrected acuity worse than 20/40. African Americans were more likely to remain visually impaired than were whites despite refraction (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 1.7 [1.1-2.6]). Whites were most often impaired or blind from age-related macular degeneration (1.2% vs 0.5%; P=.09). African Americans had higher rates of impairment and blindness from cataract or posterior capsular opacification (2.7% vs 1.1%; P=.006), glaucoma (0.9% vs 0.1%; P=.006), and diabetic retinopathy (1.2% vs 0.2%; P=. 004).

Conclusions: More than half of those with visual impairment or blindness had conditions that were either surgically treatable or potentially preventable. African Americans had a disproportionate number of blinding diseases, particularly those amenable to eye care intervention. Targeted interventions for specific populations to increase appropriate eye care use would greatly improve vision and function in older Americans. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:819-825

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

  • Racial variations in causes of vision loss in nursing homes: The Salisbury Eye Evaluation in Nursing Home Groups (SEEING) Study.
    Friedman DS, West SK, Munoz B, Park W, Deremeik J, Massof R, Frick K, Broman A, McGill W, Gilbert D, German P. Friedman DS, et al. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004 Jul;122(7):1019-24. doi: 10.1001/archopht.122.7.1019. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004. PMID: 15249367 Clinical Trial.
  • Causes of blindness and visual impairment in a population-based sample of U.S. Hispanics.
    Rodriguez J, Sanchez R, Munoz B, West SK, Broman A, Snyder RW, Klein R, Quigley H. Rodriguez J, et al. Ophthalmology. 2002 Apr;109(4):737-43. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(01)01008-9. Ophthalmology. 2002. PMID: 11927431
  • Prevalence and causes of visual impairment in The Barbados Eye Study.
    Hyman L, Wu SY, Connell AM, Schachat A, Nemesure B, Hennis A, Leske MC. Hyman L, et al. Ophthalmology. 2001 Oct;108(10):1751-6. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(01)00590-5. Ophthalmology. 2001. PMID: 11581045
  • Epidemiology of Ocular Functions and Diseases in Persons With Diabetes.
    Klein R, Klein BEK. Klein R, et al. In: Cowie CC, Casagrande SS, Menke A, Cissell MA, Eberhardt MS, Meigs JB, Gregg EW, Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Becker DJ, Brancati FL, Boyko EJ, Herman WH, Howard BV, Narayan KMV, Rewers M, Fradkin JE, editors. Diabetes in America. 3rd edition. Bethesda (MD): National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (US); 2018 Aug. CHAPTER 21. In: Cowie CC, Casagrande SS, Menke A, Cissell MA, Eberhardt MS, Meigs JB, Gregg EW, Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Becker DJ, Brancati FL, Boyko EJ, Herman WH, Howard BV, Narayan KMV, Rewers M, Fradkin JE, editors. Diabetes in America. 3rd edition. Bethesda (MD): National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (US); 2018 Aug. CHAPTER 21. PMID: 33651534 Free Books & Documents. Review.
  • Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990-2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Flaxman SR, Bourne RRA, Resnikoff S, Ackland P, Braithwaite T, Cicinelli MV, Das A, Jonas JB, Keeffe J, Kempen JH, Leasher J, Limburg H, Naidoo K, Pesudovs K, Silvester A, Stevens GA, Tahhan N, Wong TY, Taylor HR; Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study. Flaxman SR, et al. Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Dec;5(12):e1221-e1234. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30393-5. Epub 2017 Oct 11. Lancet Glob Health. 2017. PMID: 29032195 Review.

Cited by

Publication types