A comparison of cell cycle markers in well-differentiated lobular and ductal carcinomas

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2000 May;61(2):161-70. doi: 10.1023/a:1006479113769.


Infiltrating lobular carcinoma (ILC) and infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC) are similar in many respects and their histologic features occasionally overlap. Despite the many similarities, some clinical follow-up data and the patterns of metastasis suggest that ILC and IDC are biologically distinct. Unfortunately, most breast cancer research has focused almost exclusively on the ductal subtype or has not stressed the biologic or molecular genetic distinctions between breast carcinoma subtypes. Several reports have suggested the possibility that ILCs and IDCs differ with respect to expression of antigens involved in proliferation and cell cycle regulation. Therefore, we undertook an immunohistochemical evaluation of cell cycle related antigens in ILCs, including histologic variants thought to represent aggressive neoplasms, and IDCs matched for histologic grade (Modified Bloom-Richardson Grade I). We believe that different antigen expression profiles could elucidate the biological distinctiveness of breast carcinoma subtypes and possibly provide diagnostically relevant information. We studied the expression of the following antigens in 28 archived, formalin-fixed ILCs and 34 well-differentiated IDCs: estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), Her 2-neu, mib-1, cyclin D1, p27, p53, mdm-2 and bcl-2. 94% of ILCs and 100% of IDCs expressed ER; 75% of ILCs and 76% of IDCs expressed PR; 4% of ILCs and 13% of IDCs expressed c cerb B-2; ILCs and IDCs both expressed mib-1 in approximately 10% of lesional cells; 82% of ILCs and 54% of IDCs expressed cyclin D1; 90% of ILCs and 83% IDCs expressed p27 strongly; 4% of ILCs and 4% of IDCs expressed p53, 25% of ILCs and 33% of IDCs expressed mdm-2; 96% of ILCs and 100% of IDCs expressed bcl-2. None of the apparent differences were statistically significant. The ILC variants demonstrated immunophenotypes that were essentially similar to ILCs of the usual type. We conclude that ILCs and well-differentiated IDCs show similar proliferation and cell cycle control antigen profiles. Despite their unusual histologic features, most ILC variants appear to maintain a characteristic ILC immunophenotype.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Antigens, Neoplasm / analysis
  • Antigens, Nuclear
  • Biomarkers / analysis
  • Breast Neoplasms / chemistry*
  • Breast Neoplasms / pathology
  • Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast / chemistry*
  • Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast / pathology
  • Carcinoma, Lobular / chemistry*
  • Carcinoma, Lobular / pathology
  • Cell Cycle Proteins / analysis*
  • Cell Cycle*
  • Cohort Studies
  • Cyclin D1 / analysis
  • Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p27
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Immunophenotyping
  • Ki-67 Antigen
  • Microtubule-Associated Proteins / analysis
  • Neoplasm Invasiveness
  • Neoplasm Metastasis
  • Neoplasm Proteins / analysis*
  • Nuclear Proteins / analysis
  • Proto-Oncogene Proteins / analysis
  • Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2 / analysis
  • Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2
  • Receptor, ErbB-2 / analysis
  • Receptors, Estrogen / analysis
  • Receptors, Progesterone / analysis
  • Tumor Suppressor Protein p53 / analysis
  • Tumor Suppressor Proteins*


  • Antigens, Neoplasm
  • Antigens, Nuclear
  • Biomarkers
  • Cell Cycle Proteins
  • Ki-67 Antigen
  • Microtubule-Associated Proteins
  • Neoplasm Proteins
  • Nuclear Proteins
  • Proto-Oncogene Proteins
  • Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2
  • Receptors, Estrogen
  • Receptors, Progesterone
  • Tumor Suppressor Protein p53
  • Tumor Suppressor Proteins
  • Cyclin D1
  • Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p27
  • MDM2 protein, human
  • Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2
  • Receptor, ErbB-2