Electrical impedance scanning for classifying suspicious breast lesions: first results

Eur Radiol. 2000;10(10):1555-61. doi: 10.1007/s003300000553.

Abstract

It has long been established that cancer cells exhibit altered local dielectric properties compared with normal cells. Consequently, different electrical conductivity and capacitance are measurable in malignant vs normal tissues. In this study we evaluated the reliability of electrical impedance scanning (EIS), a new technology, for the classification of suspicious lesions: differentiating benign from malignant, and as a primary means of detection of breast cancer. Fifty-two women with 58 sonographically and/or mammographically suspicious findings were examined using electrical impedance scanning. Two different examination modes of TransScan TS2000 (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany), the standard-resolution mode for a routine overview examination, and the targeted high-resolution mode for a local examination of the suspicious lesion were used. All patients were additionally imaged by MR mammography (MRM) and underwent core-biopsy and/or surgical treatment after the EIS examination. With respect to the histopathological findings (29 malignant and 29 benign lesions) 27 of 29 (93.1%) malignant lesions were correctly identified using the high-resolution mode of EIS, whereas 19 of 29 (65.5%) benign lesions were correctly identified as benign (10 of 29 benign lesions showed as false-positive findings). Negative and positive predictive values of 90.5 and 73.0% were observed, respectively. Using the standard-resolution mode 22 of 29 malignancies were correctly detected (sensitivity 75.9%), whereas 22 of 29 were correctly identified as benign (specificity 72.4%). Electrical impedance scanning appears to be a promising new technology providing a relatively high sensitivity for the verification of suspicious mammographic and/or sonographic lesions especially using the high-resolution mode for local examinations. Artifacts, such as signals from superficial skin lesions, poor contact, and air bubbles, are currently a limitation.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Breast Neoplasms / classification*
  • Breast Neoplasms / diagnosis*
  • Diagnosis, Differential
  • Diagnostic Errors
  • Diagnostic Imaging / methods*
  • Electric Impedance
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Severity of Illness Index