The volar skin of primates: its frictional characteristics and their functional significance
- PMID: 111555
- DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330500402
The volar skin of primates: its frictional characteristics and their functional significance
Abstract
Friction of volar skin on wood is not proportional to load in human beings and prosimians, but to load raised to a fractional power. This meets theoretical expectations for the frictional characteristics of convex elastic surfaces. Although this enables small clawless primates to cling to steeper slopes and larger vertical supports than would otherwise be possible, the magnitude of the effect is not great enough to overcome the disadvantages of clawlessness in climbing vertical or steeply-sloping tree trunks and branches. In human subjects, friction appears to be more nearly proportional to load than in small prosimians used as experimental subjects. It is suggested that this is due to the fact that the small animals have discrete, elevated volar pads. Pad coalescence in large primates may be an adaptation for increasing the power to which load must be raised to become proportional to friction; increasing this exponent yields more friction per unit of adduction force on supports that are small relative to the animals' dimensions and weights.
Similar articles
-
Density of muscle spindles in prosimian shoulder muscles reflects locomotor adaptation.Cells Tissues Organs. 2006;184(2):96-101. doi: 10.1159/000098951. Cells Tissues Organs. 2006. PMID: 17361082
-
Body size and scaling of the hands and feet of prosimian primates.Am J Phys Anthropol. 2007 Jun;133(2):828-40. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.20586. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2007. PMID: 17340639
-
New hand bones of Hadropithecus stenognathus: implications for the paleobiology of the Archaeolemuridae.J Hum Evol. 2008 Mar;54(3):405-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2007.09.010. J Hum Evol. 2008. PMID: 18068213
-
Biomechanical consequences of scaling.J Exp Biol. 2005 May;208(Pt 9):1665-76. doi: 10.1242/jeb.01520. J Exp Biol. 2005. PMID: 15855398 Review.
-
[The social structure of primates].Anthropol Anz. 1985 Jun;43(2):97-164. Anthropol Anz. 1985. PMID: 3927823 Review. German.
Cited by
-
The Change in Fingertip Contact Area as a Novel Proprioceptive Cue.Curr Biol. 2016 May 9;26(9):1159-63. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.02.052. Epub 2016 Apr 7. Curr Biol. 2016. PMID: 27068417 Free PMC article.
-
Fingerprint ridges allow primates to regulate grip.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Dec 15;117(50):31665-31673. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2001055117. Epub 2020 Nov 30. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020. PMID: 33257543 Free PMC article.
-
Arboreal Day Geckos (Phelsuma madagascariensis) Differentially Modulate Fore- and Hind Limb Kinematics in Response to Changes in Habitat Structure.PLoS One. 2016 May 4;11(5):e0153520. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153520. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27145027 Free PMC article.
-
The African ape-like foot of Ardipithecus ramidus and its implications for the origin of bipedalism.Elife. 2019 Apr 30;8:e44433. doi: 10.7554/eLife.44433. Elife. 2019. PMID: 31038121 Free PMC article.
-
Physical constraints lead to parallel evolution of micro- and nanostructures of animal adhesive pads: a review.Beilstein J Nanotechnol. 2021 Jul 15;12:725-743. doi: 10.3762/bjnano.12.57. eCollection 2021. Beilstein J Nanotechnol. 2021. PMID: 34354900 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
