Attitudes and knowledge of hospital pharmacists to adverse drug reaction reporting

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001 Jan;51(1):81-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2001.01306.x.


Aims: To investigate the attitudes of UK hospital pharmacists towards, and their understanding, of adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting.

Methods: A postal questionnaire survey of 600 randomly selected hospital pharmacists was conducted.

Results: The response rate was 53.7% (n = 322). A total of 217 Yellow Cards had been submitted to the CSM/MCA by 78 (25.6%) of those responding. Half of those responding felt that ADR reporting should be compulsory and over three-quarters felt it was a professional obligation. However, almost half were unclear as to what should be reported, while the time available in clinical practice and time taken to complete forms were deemed to be major deterrents to reporting. Pharmacists were not dissuaded from reporting by the need to consult a medical colleague or by the absence of a fee. Education and training had a significant influence on pharmacists' participation in the Yellow Card Scheme.

Conclusions: Pharmacists have a reasonable knowledge and are supportive of the Yellow Card spontaneous ADR reporting scheme. However, education and training will be important in maintaining and increasing ADR reports from pharmacists.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems*
  • Aged
  • Education, Pharmacy
  • Female
  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pharmacists*
  • Pharmacy Service, Hospital / organization & administration*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • United Kingdom