Until the mid 1970s, it was generally assumed that, with the short pulses of ultrasound (US) used in medical diagnosis, there was little need for concern about the possibility of inertial cavitation in vivo. This assumption came into question when experimental evidence indicated that killing of fruit fly larvae by diagnostically relevant US was associated with the presence of gas in the respiratory apparatus of the organisms. Independent theoretical contributions by Flynn and Apfel in the early 1980s made it clear that complacency in regard to cavitation was not warranted. Later, the mammalian lung, as with larva, was shown to be particularly vulnerable when it contained air. Yet, overall evidence suggests that lung hemorrhage is not consistent with the classical picture of inertial cavitation. Most recently, however, hemolysis and hemorrhage associated with the use of contrast agents have provided nearly incontrovertible evidence of the occurrence of cavitation in vivo.