Influence of financial productivity incentives on the use of preventive care
- PMID: 11182103
- DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00692-6
Influence of financial productivity incentives on the use of preventive care
Abstract
Purpose: We examined whether physician factors, particularly financial productivity incentives, affect the provision of preventive care.
Subjects and methods: We surveyed and reviewed the charts of 4,473 patients who saw 1 of 169 internists from 11 academically affiliated primary care practices in Boston. We abstracted cancer risk factors, comorbid conditions, and the dates of the last Papanicolaou (Pap) smear, mammogram, cholesterol screening, and influenza vaccination. We obtained physician information including the method of financial compensation through a mailed physician survey. We used multivariable logistic regression to examine the association between physician factors and four outcomes based on Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS) measures: (1) Pap smear within the prior 3 years among women 20 to 75 years old; (2) mammogram in the prior 2 years among women 52 to 69 years old; (3) cholesterol screening within the prior 5 years among patients 40 to 64 years old; and (4) influenza vaccination among patients 65 years old and older. All analyses accounted for clus-tering by provider and site and were converted into adjusted rates.
Results: After adjustment for practice site, clinical, and physician factors, patients cared for by physicians with financial productivity incentives were significantly less likely than those cared for by physicians without this incentive to receive Pap smears (rate difference, 12%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5% to 18%) and cholesterol screening (rate difference, 4%; 95% CI: 0% to 8%). Financial incentives were not significantly associated with rates of mammography (rate difference, -3%; 95% CI: -15% to 10%) or influenza vaccination (rate difference, -13%; 95% CI: -28% to 2%).
Conclusions: Our findings suggest that some financial productivity incentives may discourage the performance of certain forms of preventive care, specifically Pap smears and cholesterol screening. More studies are needed to examine the effects of financial incentives on the quality of care, and to examine whether quality improvement interventions or incentives based on quality improve the performance of preventive care.
Comment in
-
Only human? The effect of financial productivity incentives on physicians' use of preventive care measures.Am J Med. 2001 Feb 15;110(3):226-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00735-x. Am J Med. 2001. PMID: 11182112 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Why do patients of female physicians have higher rates of breast and cervical cancer screening?J Gen Intern Med. 1997 Jan;12(1):34-43. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.12102.x. J Gen Intern Med. 1997. PMID: 9034944 Free PMC article.
-
Preventive care for women. Does the sex of the physician matter?N Engl J Med. 1993 Aug 12;329(7):478-82. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199308123290707. N Engl J Med. 1993. PMID: 8332153
-
Can preventive care activities in general practice be sustained when financial incentives and external audit plus feedback are removed? ACCEPt-able: a cluster randomised controlled trial protocol.Implement Sci. 2016 Sep 13;11(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0489-0. Implement Sci. 2016. PMID: 27624835 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The effect of financial incentives on the quality of health care provided by primary care physicians.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Sep 7;(9):CD008451. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008451.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011. PMID: 21901722 Review.
-
Predictors of screening for breast, cervical, colorectal, and prostatic cancer among community-based primary care practices.J Am Board Fam Pract. 2000 Jan-Feb;13(1):1-10. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.13.1.1. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2000. PMID: 10682879 Review.
Cited by
-
A Cancer Patient Journey: Complete Review During Acute Treatment Phase.Health Equity. 2019 Aug 12;3(1):403-408. doi: 10.1089/heq.2019.0046. eCollection 2019. Health Equity. 2019. PMID: 31406954 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions to increase influenza vaccination rates of those 60 years and older in the community.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 30;5(5):CD005188. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005188.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29845606 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Primary Care Providers' Beliefs and Recommendations and Use of Screening Mammography by their Patients.J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Apr;32(4):449-457. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3973-y. Epub 2017 Jan 9. J Gen Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 28070772 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions to increase influenza vaccination rates of those 60 years and older in the community.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 7;2014(7):CD005188. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005188.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 30;5:CD005188. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005188.pub4. PMID: 24999919 Free PMC article. Updated. Review.
-
Multilevel interventions: study design and analysis issues.J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2012 May;2012(44):49-55. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgs010. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2012. PMID: 22623596 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
