Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2001 Mar;47(3):418-25.

Evaluation of Nine Automated High-Sensitivity C-reactive Protein Methods: Implications for Clinical and Epidemiological Applications. Part 2

Affiliations
  • PMID: 11238291
Comparative Study

Evaluation of Nine Automated High-Sensitivity C-reactive Protein Methods: Implications for Clinical and Epidemiological Applications. Part 2

W L Roberts et al. Clin Chem. .

Erratum in

  • Clin Chem 2001 May;47(5):980

Abstract

Background: C-Reactive protein (CRP) can provide prognostic information about risk of future coronary events in apparently healthy subjects. This application requires higher sensitivity assays than have traditionally been available in the clinical laboratory.

Methods: Nine high-sensitivity CRP (hs-CRP) methods from Dade Behring, Daiichi, Denka Seiken, Diagnostic Products Corporation, Iatron, Kamiya, Olympus, Roche, and Wako were evaluated for limit of detection, linearity, precision, prozone effect, and comparability with samples from 388 apparently healthy individuals.

Results: All methods had limits of detection that were lower than the manufacturers' claimed limit of quantification except for the Kamiya, Roche, and Wako methods. All methods were linear at 0.3-10 mg/L. The Diagnostic Products Corporation, Kamiya, Olympus, and Wako methods had imprecision (CVs) >10% at 0.15 mg/L. The Iatron, Olympus, and Wako methods demonstrated prozone effects at hs-CRP concentrations of 12, 206, and 117 mg/L, respectively. hs-CRP concentrations demarcating each quartile in a healthy population were method-dependent. Ninety-two to 95% of subjects were classified into the same quartile of hs-CRP established by the Dade Behring method by the Denka Seiken, Diagnostic Products Corporation, Iatron, and Wako methods. In contrast, 68-77% of subjects were classified into the same quartile by the Daiichi, Kamiya, Olympus, and Roche methods. No subject varied by more than one quartile by any method.

Conclusions: Four of the nine examined hs-CRP methods classified apparently healthy subjects into quartiles of hs-CRP similar to the classifications assigned by the comparison method. Additional standardization efforts are required because an individual patient's results will be interpreted using population-based cutpoints.

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 94 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback