[Would a crash helmet have been life-saving? An analysis of 188 fatal motor scooter accidents (author's transl)]

Z Rechtsmed. 1975;75(4):235-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00201177.
[Article in German]

Abstract

In both Germany and Denmark bills have been passed, that mopedists and motorcyclists should wear crash helmets in traffic. In an effort to elucidate the practical life-saving effect of such measures, this investigation has been performed in The Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Aarhus, Denmark. Within the period 1959-1973 in all 188 mopedists killed in traffic accidents were submitted to medico-legal examination at the institute. All documents, including the police reports, photographs, the detailed autopsy-reports and medical case records were scrutinized in order to elucidate whether a crash helmet had been used during the accident, and if not, whether such use would have been life-saving. In 4 cases only, a crash helmet was used. Of the 188 moped drivers 54.2% died of scull-brain injuries, 33% of other injuries, while 12.8% died of combined scull-brain and other injuries. Following a thorough consideration of the circumstances and findings in each case, the authors in a retrospective judgment concluded, that 51% of the killed moped drivers probably should have survived the accident if they had worn an appropriate crash helmet. A further 8.5% might have survived. The authors admit that their material was selected and the results could hardly be considered indicative for the traffic in general, but are indicative of a tendency.

Publication types

  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Accidents, Traffic*
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Brain Injuries / prevention & control
  • Denmark
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Protective Devices*