Edge co-occurrence in natural images predicts contour grouping performance
- PMID: 11248261
- DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00277-7
Edge co-occurrence in natural images predicts contour grouping performance
Abstract
The human brain manages to correctly interpret almost every visual image it receives from the environment. Underlying this ability are contour grouping mechanisms that appropriately link local edge elements into global contours. Although a general view of how the brain achieves effective contour grouping has emerged, there have been a number of different specific proposals and few successes at quantitatively predicting performance. These previous proposals have been developed largely by intuition and computational trial and error. A more principled approach is to begin with an examination of the statistical properties of contours that exist in natural images, because it is these statistics that drove the evolution of the grouping mechanisms. Here we report measurements of both absolute and Bayesian edge co-occurrence statistics in natural images, as well as human performance for detecting natural-shaped contours in complex backgrounds. We find that contour detection performance is quantitatively predicted by a local grouping rule derived directly from the co-occurrence statistics, in combination with a very simple integration rule (a transitivity rule) that links the locally grouped contour elements into longer contours.
Similar articles
-
Ecological statistics of Gestalt laws for the perceptual organization of contours.J Vis. 2002;2(4):324-53. doi: 10.1167/2.4.5. J Vis. 2002. PMID: 12678582
-
Contour statistics in natural images: grouping across occlusions.Vis Neurosci. 2009 Jan-Feb;26(1):109-21. doi: 10.1017/S0952523808080875. Epub 2009 Feb 16. Vis Neurosci. 2009. PMID: 19216819 Free PMC article.
-
Does contour classification precede contour grouping in perception of partially visible figures?Perception. 2007;36(4):558-80. doi: 10.1068/p5655. Perception. 2007. PMID: 17564202
-
Perception of contours and shapes: low and intermediate stage mechanisms.Vision Res. 2008 Sep;48(20):2106-27. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.03.006. Epub 2008 May 27. Vision Res. 2008. PMID: 18502467 Review.
-
Bayesian inference of form and shape.Prog Brain Res. 2006;154:265-70. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)54014-2. Prog Brain Res. 2006. PMID: 17010717 Review.
Cited by
-
A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure-ground organization.Psychol Bull. 2012 Nov;138(6):1172-217. doi: 10.1037/a0029333. Epub 2012 Jul 30. Psychol Bull. 2012. PMID: 22845751 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Temporal asynchrony and spatial perception.Sci Rep. 2016 Jul 27;6:30413. doi: 10.1038/srep30413. Sci Rep. 2016. PMID: 27460532 Free PMC article.
-
Object Boundary Detection in Natural Images May Depend on "Incitatory" Cell-Cell Interactions.J Neurosci. 2022 Nov 30;42(48):8960-8979. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2581-18.2022. Epub 2022 Oct 14. J Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 36241385 Free PMC article.
-
Combining priors and noisy visual cues in a rapid pointing task.J Neurosci. 2006 Oct 4;26(40):10154-63. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2779-06.2006. J Neurosci. 2006. PMID: 17021171 Free PMC article.
-
Features and the 'primal sketch'.Vision Res. 2011 Apr 13;51(7):738-53. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.08.002. Epub 2010 Aug 7. Vision Res. 2011. PMID: 20696182 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
